Gender Differences to the Contextual Factors Questionnaire and Implications for General Practice

J. Pelletier
{"title":"Gender Differences to the Contextual Factors Questionnaire and Implications for General Practice","authors":"J. Pelletier","doi":"10.4172/2329-9126.1000297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to contribute to the revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) \n by exploring how mental health service users and their relatives conceive the influence of the contextual factors, as \n described in Chap. 21 of the ICD-10, on a) the onset of a mental or behavioral disorder; b) the resurgence of such a \n disorder; and c) the recovery process. In individual interviews, the 18 main categories of contextual factors proposed \n by the ICD-11 (beta draft) were discussed through the Contextual Factors Questionnaire (CFQ) by 28 participants \n who completed the CFQ individually. \nThis paper presents the results from a t-test that was performed on the data set to assess whether the means for \n two groups who completed the CFQ were statistically different from each other (p≤ 0.05). On one hand, we found \n significant differences between users and family members for A) Housing or the environment (p=0.01), and B) \n Personal finances (p=0.04); and for C) Water or nutrition (p=0.05) between male and female participants, on the \n other hand. In light of the fact that Social or cultural environments were considered to be the most influential of all 18 \n contextual factors by all aggregated participants, this suggests that male-female differences are related to social \n norms concerning gender, rather than discrete biological sex categories.","PeriodicalId":90594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of general practice (Los Angeles, Calif.)","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2329-9126.1000297","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of general practice (Los Angeles, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-9126.1000297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to contribute to the revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) by exploring how mental health service users and their relatives conceive the influence of the contextual factors, as described in Chap. 21 of the ICD-10, on a) the onset of a mental or behavioral disorder; b) the resurgence of such a disorder; and c) the recovery process. In individual interviews, the 18 main categories of contextual factors proposed by the ICD-11 (beta draft) were discussed through the Contextual Factors Questionnaire (CFQ) by 28 participants who completed the CFQ individually. This paper presents the results from a t-test that was performed on the data set to assess whether the means for two groups who completed the CFQ were statistically different from each other (p≤ 0.05). On one hand, we found significant differences between users and family members for A) Housing or the environment (p=0.01), and B) Personal finances (p=0.04); and for C) Water or nutrition (p=0.05) between male and female participants, on the other hand. In light of the fact that Social or cultural environments were considered to be the most influential of all 18 contextual factors by all aggregated participants, this suggests that male-female differences are related to social norms concerning gender, rather than discrete biological sex categories.
情境因素问卷的性别差异及其对全科医学的启示
本研究的目的是通过探索心理健康服务使用者及其亲属如何理解情境因素对国际疾病分类(ICD-10)的影响,为国际疾病分类的修订做出贡献,如ICD-10第21章所述,a)精神或行为障碍的发作;b) 这种混乱的死灰复燃;以及c)回收过程。在个人访谈中,28名单独完成情境因素问卷的参与者通过情境因素问卷(CFQ)讨论了ICD-11(测试版草案)提出的18个主要类别的情境因素。本文给出了对数据集进行t检验的结果,以评估完成CFQ的两组人的平均值是否在统计学上存在差异(p≤0.05)。一方面,我们发现用户和家庭成员之间存在显著差异,a)住房或环境(p=0.01),B)个人财务(p=0.04);而对于C)男性和女性参与者之间的水或营养(p=0.05)。鉴于所有参与者认为社会或文化环境是所有18个背景因素中影响最大的,这表明男女差异与性别相关的社会规范有关,而不是离散的生物性别类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书