ALIRAN PEMIKIRAN USHUL FIQH DAN PENGARUHNYA TERHADAP PENDEKATAN HUKUM ISLAM

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Hanif Aidhil Alwana
{"title":"ALIRAN PEMIKIRAN USHUL FIQH DAN PENGARUHNYA TERHADAP PENDEKATAN HUKUM ISLAM","authors":"Hanif Aidhil Alwana","doi":"10.31958/juris.v19i2.2375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Law is the result of Fuqaha's ijtihad regarding an act of mukallaf, in its understanding Islamic law is derived from the al-Quran and Sunnah. Although the existence of the al-Qur`an and the Sunnah is not in doubt, the understanding of law from these sources often experiences ikhtilaf (differences) of opinion, besides this the risk of causing divisions in society, these problems are influenced by schools of legal thought. T his paper will describe the history of these schools of thought and their relevance in establishing law. The method used was descriptive analysis, with a qualitative approach based on the content (content analysis) of previous writings. In this paper, it is found that the difference in legal opinion is influenced by the way of thinking of the mujtahid which is divided into mutakallimin schools which are identical to understanding the legal text; fuqaha with the style of rules and legal reasons extracted from the law-making text (syari`) or also termed a contextual style; and a combination that seeks to combine the two types of legal understanding, this gives birth to different legal features. This is the scientific treasure of Islamic law which must be developed in the future to always exist in answer ing legal problems in the future .","PeriodicalId":31912,"journal":{"name":"Juris Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juris Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v19i2.2375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Law is the result of Fuqaha's ijtihad regarding an act of mukallaf, in its understanding Islamic law is derived from the al-Quran and Sunnah. Although the existence of the al-Qur`an and the Sunnah is not in doubt, the understanding of law from these sources often experiences ikhtilaf (differences) of opinion, besides this the risk of causing divisions in society, these problems are influenced by schools of legal thought. T his paper will describe the history of these schools of thought and their relevance in establishing law. The method used was descriptive analysis, with a qualitative approach based on the content (content analysis) of previous writings. In this paper, it is found that the difference in legal opinion is influenced by the way of thinking of the mujtahid which is divided into mutakallimin schools which are identical to understanding the legal text; fuqaha with the style of rules and legal reasons extracted from the law-making text (syari`) or also termed a contextual style; and a combination that seeks to combine the two types of legal understanding, this gives birth to different legal features. This is the scientific treasure of Islamic law which must be developed in the future to always exist in answer ing legal problems in the future .
世界发展规律及其对伊斯兰法院发展的警示
法律是Fuqaha关于穆卡拉夫行为的ijtihad的结果,在其理解中,伊斯兰法律源自《古兰经》和《圣训》。尽管《古兰经》和《圣训》的存在是毋庸置疑的,但从这些来源对法律的理解往往会经历意见分歧,除了造成社会分裂的风险外,这些问题还受到法律思想流派的影响。本文将描述这些学派的历史及其在制定法律方面的相关性。所使用的方法是描述性分析,采用基于先前著作内容(内容分析)的定性方法。本文发现,法律意见的差异是受穆吉塔希德思想方式的影响,穆吉塔hid分为与理解法律文本相同的穆塔卡利明学派;从法律制定文本中提取的规则和法律理由风格的fuqaha(syari)或也被称为上下文风格;并试图将两种类型的法律理解结合起来,从而产生不同的法律特征。这是伊斯兰法律的科学宝库,必须在未来得到发展,才能在未来的法律问题中始终存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书