Towards a reparative welfare state

IF 3.8 2区经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS

New Political Economy Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/13563467.2022.2084519

E. Klein

引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT The writings of TH Marshall, Esping Anderson and other welfare state scholars have been concerned with class-based inequalities bought about through capitalism. Yet the focus on exploitation of labour overlooks racialised and gendered inequalities bought about through historic and contemporary processes of expropriation also inherent in capitalism. In this paper, I argue that addressing processes of expropriation are fundamental to the political economy of the welfare state and propose a reparative way of thinking to transform the welfare state. Drawing on insights from the transformative reparation literature, I outline three modes of transformation – unsettling accumulation by dispossession, disrupting dehumanising subjectivities and supporting pluriversal possibilities as processes to transform the structures that uphold expropriation and the welfare state.

查看原文本刊更多论文

走向一个补偿性的福利国家

马歇尔(TH Marshall)、安德森(Esping Anderson)和其他福利国家学者的著作一直关注资本主义带来的阶级不平等。然而，对劳动力剥削的关注忽视了历史和当代剥夺过程中产生的种族化和性别不平等，这也是资本主义固有的。本文认为，解决征收过程是福利国家政治经济学的基础，并提出了一种改造福利国家的补偿性思维方式。借鉴转型赔偿文献的见解，我概述了三种转型模式——剥夺带来的令人不安的积累，破坏非人性化的主体性，以及支持多元化的可能性，作为转变维护征用和福利国家的结构的过程。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

New Political Economy Multiple-

CiteScore

10.10

自引率

9.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： New Political Economy aims to create a forum for work which combines the breadth of vision which characterised the classical political economy of the nineteenth century with the analytical advances of twentieth century social science. It seeks to represent the terrain of political economy scholarship across different disciplines, emphasising original and innovative work which explores new approaches and methodologies, and addresses core debates and issues of historical and contemporary relevance.