Facilitators and barriers in oncology clinical practice influencing nurses' completion of GRASP Workload Measurement System to ensure patient-centred care.

Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal Pub Date : 2022-10-01 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5737/23688076324463
Eleonora Cretu, Anita Long, Kalliopi Kalli Stilos
{"title":"Facilitators and barriers in oncology clinical practice influencing nurses' completion of GRASP Workload Measurement System to ensure patient-centred care.","authors":"Eleonora Cretu, Anita Long, Kalliopi Kalli Stilos","doi":"10.5737/23688076324463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hospital administrators have a great interest in obtaining a valid and reliable nursing workload measurement to help determine the hours of care needed per patient; one such method available is the GRASP Workload Measurement System. At Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, nurses' GRASP compliance and accuracy varies and often does not meet the target of 90%. The target assists the organization in estimating ongoing nursing workload and patients' care needs, while ensuring the provision of safe and appropriate care that is fiscally responsible. The objective of the quality initiative reported in this paper was to identify the facilitators and barriers that influence nurses' completion of GRASP. The quality improvement project was conducted using a mixed-method design with a sample of 28 nurses working in oncology acute care and palliative care inpatient units. The Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF), often used in behaviour change studies, was used in designing the questionnaire survey and interview questions that listed pertinent and measurable factors that may influence nurses' GRASP completion. Facilitators included: nurses' knowledge about the role GRASP has in funding and staffing levels, job responsibility, and perception of GRASP as a potential tool to organize work. Barriers identified by nurses included insufficient GRASP knowledge, limited access to workstations and computers, GRASP tool elements not capturing the complexity of the nursing work, time constraints, increased patients' acuity, and care demands. In addition to the Theoretical Domain Framework, the Normalization Process Theory was used to guide the implementation and evaluation of the recommendations to enhance nurses' GRASP compliance and adherence practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":31563,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal","volume":" ","pages":"463-472"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11195648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5737/23688076324463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hospital administrators have a great interest in obtaining a valid and reliable nursing workload measurement to help determine the hours of care needed per patient; one such method available is the GRASP Workload Measurement System. At Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, nurses' GRASP compliance and accuracy varies and often does not meet the target of 90%. The target assists the organization in estimating ongoing nursing workload and patients' care needs, while ensuring the provision of safe and appropriate care that is fiscally responsible. The objective of the quality initiative reported in this paper was to identify the facilitators and barriers that influence nurses' completion of GRASP. The quality improvement project was conducted using a mixed-method design with a sample of 28 nurses working in oncology acute care and palliative care inpatient units. The Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF), often used in behaviour change studies, was used in designing the questionnaire survey and interview questions that listed pertinent and measurable factors that may influence nurses' GRASP completion. Facilitators included: nurses' knowledge about the role GRASP has in funding and staffing levels, job responsibility, and perception of GRASP as a potential tool to organize work. Barriers identified by nurses included insufficient GRASP knowledge, limited access to workstations and computers, GRASP tool elements not capturing the complexity of the nursing work, time constraints, increased patients' acuity, and care demands. In addition to the Theoretical Domain Framework, the Normalization Process Theory was used to guide the implementation and evaluation of the recommendations to enhance nurses' GRASP compliance and adherence practice.

肿瘤临床实践中影响护士完成GRASP工作量测量系统以确保以患者为中心的护理的因素和障碍
医院管理人员对获得有效可靠的护理工作量测量非常感兴趣,以帮助确定每位患者所需的护理时间;其中一个可用的方法是GRASP工作量测量系统。在Sunnybrook健康科学中心,护士的GRASP依从性和准确性各不相同,通常达不到90%的目标。该目标帮助该组织估计正在进行的护理工作量和患者的护理需求,同时确保提供安全和适当的护理,并在财政上负责。本文报道的质量倡议的目标是确定影响护士完成GRASP的促进因素和障碍。质量改进项目采用混合方法设计,样本为28名在肿瘤急症护理和姑息治疗住院病房工作的护士。通常用于行为改变研究的理论领域框架(TDF)被用于设计问卷调查和访谈问题,列出可能影响护士掌握完成的相关和可测量的因素。促进因素包括:护士对GRASP在资金和人员配备水平、工作职责方面的作用的了解,以及对GRASP作为组织工作的潜在工具的看法。护士发现的障碍包括掌握知识不足、工作站和计算机的使用受限、掌握工具元素不能反映护理工作的复杂性、时间限制、患者的敏锐度增加和护理需求。除理论领域框架外,规范化过程理论还用于指导建议的实施和评估,以提高护士对GRASP的依从性和依从性实践。关键词:护士;护理工作量测量;护理工作
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal is published quarterly in the Winter, Spring, Summer and Fall. The CONJ is the only Canadian publication in cancer nursing. It is a bilingual, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the interests of the professional nurse who provides care to patients with cancer and their families. The journal endeavours to publish timely papers, promote the image of the nurse involved in cancer care, stimulate nursing issues in oncology nursing and encourage nurses to publish in national media.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信