The efficacy of enhanced recovery protocol from anesthesia in diabetic patients undergoing radical cystectomy

Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20905068.2020.1842086
R. Ammar, Emad A Areda, Ahmed Abd El Aziz El Abbady, Mina Wadieh Halim
{"title":"The efficacy of enhanced recovery protocol from anesthesia in diabetic patients undergoing radical cystectomy","authors":"R. Ammar, Emad A Areda, Ahmed Abd El Aziz El Abbady, Mina Wadieh Halim","doi":"10.1080/20905068.2020.1842086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background: Prevalence of diabetes in surgical patients is 10–40%. They have higher incidence of complications, and longer stay in hospital compared to non-diabetic. Radical cystectomy with urinary diversion is considered one of the high-risk surgeries associated with morbidity and mortality. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based multimodal surgical care protocol that improves post-operative outcomes and length of stay (LOS) in patients without diabetes. This study evaluates the evidence on whether diabetic patientswould benefit from ERAS pathway. The aim of the study: was to evaluate the efficacy of ERAS protocol from anesthesia in diabetic patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Patients and methods: This study was carried out in Alexandria main University Hospital on fifty-four adult ASA physical status I, II and III participants of either sex. Participants were scheduled for radical cystectomy surgeries under the effect of general anesthesia, following ERAS protocol, divided into two group diabetic and non-diabetic27 participants each. The ICON device was used to measure the stroke volume variation (SVV) to apply goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) for all patients. Measurements: Demographic data, hemodynamic parameters (stoke volume, cardiac index), intra-operative fluid requirement, blood loss, postoperative pain intensity, time of first bowel movement, PH, Bicarbonate level, serum lactate level, heamatocrit and LOS were measured and recorded. Main results: No statistical significant difference was detected between both groups as regard age, sex, weight, vital signs, serum lactate, first bowel movement and VAS. There was statistical significant difference between both groups as regard fluid requirement, and the days of hospital stay. Conclusion: ERAS is a beneficial protocol to improve postoperative outcome in radical cystectomy surgeries, it can be used in diabetic patients to decrease postoperative morbidity and mortality.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20905068.2020.1842086","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20905068.2020.1842086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Prevalence of diabetes in surgical patients is 10–40%. They have higher incidence of complications, and longer stay in hospital compared to non-diabetic. Radical cystectomy with urinary diversion is considered one of the high-risk surgeries associated with morbidity and mortality. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based multimodal surgical care protocol that improves post-operative outcomes and length of stay (LOS) in patients without diabetes. This study evaluates the evidence on whether diabetic patientswould benefit from ERAS pathway. The aim of the study: was to evaluate the efficacy of ERAS protocol from anesthesia in diabetic patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Patients and methods: This study was carried out in Alexandria main University Hospital on fifty-four adult ASA physical status I, II and III participants of either sex. Participants were scheduled for radical cystectomy surgeries under the effect of general anesthesia, following ERAS protocol, divided into two group diabetic and non-diabetic27 participants each. The ICON device was used to measure the stroke volume variation (SVV) to apply goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) for all patients. Measurements: Demographic data, hemodynamic parameters (stoke volume, cardiac index), intra-operative fluid requirement, blood loss, postoperative pain intensity, time of first bowel movement, PH, Bicarbonate level, serum lactate level, heamatocrit and LOS were measured and recorded. Main results: No statistical significant difference was detected between both groups as regard age, sex, weight, vital signs, serum lactate, first bowel movement and VAS. There was statistical significant difference between both groups as regard fluid requirement, and the days of hospital stay. Conclusion: ERAS is a beneficial protocol to improve postoperative outcome in radical cystectomy surgeries, it can be used in diabetic patients to decrease postoperative morbidity and mortality.
分享
查看原文
强化麻醉恢复方案在糖尿病根治性膀胱切除术患者中的疗效
摘要背景:外科手术患者的糖尿病患病率为10-40%。与非糖尿病患者相比,他们的并发症发生率更高,住院时间更长。根治性膀胱切除术合并尿路改道被认为是与发病率和死亡率相关的高危手术之一。增强术后恢复(ERAS)是一种基于证据的多模式手术护理方案,可改善无糖尿病患者的术后结果和住院时间(LOS)。本研究评估了糖尿病患者是否会受益于ERAS途径的证据。本研究的目的:评估ERAS方案在糖尿病根治性膀胱切除术患者麻醉下的疗效。患者和方法:这项研究在亚历山大主要大学医院对54名成年ASA身体状况I、II和III的男女参与者进行。根据ERAS方案,参与者被安排在全身麻醉下进行根治性膀胱切除术,分为糖尿病和非糖尿病两组,每组27名参与者。ICON设备用于测量中风体积变化(SVV),以对所有患者应用目标导向液体治疗(GDFT)。测量:测量并记录人口统计学数据、血液动力学参数(行程量、心脏指数)、术中液体需求、失血量、术后疼痛强度、首次排便时间、PH、碳酸氢盐水平、血清乳酸水平、红细胞压积和LOS。主要结果:两组在年龄、性别、体重、生命体征、血清乳酸、首次排便和VAS评分方面均无统计学差异。两组患者的液体需求量和住院天数差异有统计学意义。结论:ERAS是一种改善根治性膀胱切除术后疗效的有益方案,可用于糖尿病患者,降低术后发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信