Impact of hormonal contraception on female sexual function among university students of reproductive age in the Dominican Republic: A cross-sectional study

Sabrina Verdeja-Vicente, A. R. Villalona-Lluveres, Jenny L Cepeda-Marte
{"title":"Impact of hormonal contraception on female sexual function among university students of reproductive age in the Dominican Republic: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Sabrina Verdeja-Vicente, A. R. Villalona-Lluveres, Jenny L Cepeda-Marte","doi":"10.22206/cysa.2023.v7i2.pp7-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. Identify if hormonal contraception (HC) has a negative impact on female sexual function (FSF) in a group of university students of reproductive age in the Dominican Republic. \nMethods: A total of 251 female students between ages 18-30 completed an online survey to evaluate their FSF with the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), as well as their relationship with their contraceptive method (CM). Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and standard non-parametric tests.  \nResults: The groups in this study were: never used HC (NHC) n=80 (31.9%), uses HC (UHC) n=132 (52.6%), and abandoned HC (AHC) n=39 (15.5%). The mean grade for the FSFI for all groups was 28.84 (2.0-36.0). UHC was the lowest grade (28.15) when compared to NHC (29.84) and AHC (29.23) (p=0.023). UHC had the most participants at risk of female sexual dysfunction (FSD). The highest level of general satisfaction with their CM was in the UHC group (90.2% reported to be satisfied/very satisfied).  \nConclusion: There is a weak correlation between HC use and the increased risk of FSD with statistical significance (Rho=0.132; p=0.037). FSF levels in UHC were lower than in the NHC group. Despite having the greatest level of satisfaction with their CM, UHC reported the highest level of FSF disturbance. The disturbance of FSF due to HC use was a strong predictor of abandonment (65%).","PeriodicalId":33448,"journal":{"name":"Ciencia y Salud","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciencia y Salud","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22206/cysa.2023.v7i2.pp7-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. Identify if hormonal contraception (HC) has a negative impact on female sexual function (FSF) in a group of university students of reproductive age in the Dominican Republic. Methods: A total of 251 female students between ages 18-30 completed an online survey to evaluate their FSF with the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), as well as their relationship with their contraceptive method (CM). Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and standard non-parametric tests.  Results: The groups in this study were: never used HC (NHC) n=80 (31.9%), uses HC (UHC) n=132 (52.6%), and abandoned HC (AHC) n=39 (15.5%). The mean grade for the FSFI for all groups was 28.84 (2.0-36.0). UHC was the lowest grade (28.15) when compared to NHC (29.84) and AHC (29.23) (p=0.023). UHC had the most participants at risk of female sexual dysfunction (FSD). The highest level of general satisfaction with their CM was in the UHC group (90.2% reported to be satisfied/very satisfied).  Conclusion: There is a weak correlation between HC use and the increased risk of FSD with statistical significance (Rho=0.132; p=0.037). FSF levels in UHC were lower than in the NHC group. Despite having the greatest level of satisfaction with their CM, UHC reported the highest level of FSF disturbance. The disturbance of FSF due to HC use was a strong predictor of abandonment (65%).
多米尼加共和国育龄大学生激素避孕对女性性功能的影响:一项横断面研究
目标。确定激素避孕(HC)是否对多米尼加共和国育龄大学生群体的女性性功能(FSF)产生负面影响。方法:对251名年龄在18-30岁之间的女大学生进行在线调查,用女性性功能指数(FSFI)评估她们的FSF,以及她们与避孕方法(CM)的关系。采用描述性统计和标准非参数检验对结果进行分析。结果:本组未使用HC (NHC)者80例(31.9%),使用HC (UHC)者132例(52.6%),废弃HC (AHC)者39例(15.5%)。各组FSFI平均评分为28.84(2.0 ~ 36.0)。与NHC(29.84)和AHC(29.23)相比,UHC的评分最低(28.15)(p=0.023)。UHC参与者中女性性功能障碍(FSD)风险最高。全民健康覆盖组对CM的总体满意度最高(90.2%表示满意/非常满意)。结论:丙肝使用与FSD风险增加呈弱相关,差异有统计学意义(Rho=0.132;p = 0.037)。UHC组FSF水平低于NHC组。尽管对CM的满意度最高,但UHC报告的FSF干扰程度最高。使用HC引起的FSF紊乱是放弃的一个强有力的预测因子(65%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信