Psychoanalysis, Clinic and Context: Subjectivity, History and Autobiography

IF 0.4 Q3 Social Sciences
R. Beshara
{"title":"Psychoanalysis, Clinic and Context: Subjectivity, History and Autobiography","authors":"R. Beshara","doi":"10.7565/10.7565/LANDP.V8I2.1600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Structure was a key signifier, and a logical quilting point, informing Jacques Lacan’s return to Freud, which amounted to his reinvention of the unconscious as structured like a language. Lacan read, and reinvigorated, Sigmund Freud’s classic texts primarily through the lenses of Ferdinand de Saussure’s structural linguistics and Claude Lévi-Strauss’s structural anthropology—not mentioning Hegelianism (via Kojève), surrealism, and mathematics as other equally important lenses. The structure of subjectivity was the central question for both Freud and Lacan. While the former understood psychic structure in terms of topography, the latter explicated it through topology. What then of the structure of Ian Parker’s recently published book?","PeriodicalId":40968,"journal":{"name":"Language and Psychoanalysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7565/10.7565/LANDP.V8I2.1600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Structure was a key signifier, and a logical quilting point, informing Jacques Lacan’s return to Freud, which amounted to his reinvention of the unconscious as structured like a language. Lacan read, and reinvigorated, Sigmund Freud’s classic texts primarily through the lenses of Ferdinand de Saussure’s structural linguistics and Claude Lévi-Strauss’s structural anthropology—not mentioning Hegelianism (via Kojève), surrealism, and mathematics as other equally important lenses. The structure of subjectivity was the central question for both Freud and Lacan. While the former understood psychic structure in terms of topography, the latter explicated it through topology. What then of the structure of Ian Parker’s recently published book?
心理分析、临床与语境:主体性、历史与自传
结构是一个关键的能指,也是一个逻辑缝合点,为雅克·拉康回归弗洛伊德提供了信息,这相当于他将无意识重塑为一种语言。拉康主要通过费迪南德·德·索绪尔的结构语言学和克劳德·莱维·斯特劳斯的结构人类学的视角阅读并振兴了西格蒙德·弗洛伊德的经典文本,而没有提到黑格尔主义(通过Kojève)、超现实主义和数学等同样重要的视角。主体性的结构是弗洛伊德和拉康的中心问题。前者从拓扑学的角度理解心理结构,后者则通过拓扑学对心理结构进行阐释。伊恩·帕克最近出版的书的结构是什么?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Language and Psychoanalysis
Language and Psychoanalysis PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信