Models of attention

IF 0.1 0 ART
M. Derby
{"title":"Models of attention","authors":"M. Derby","doi":"10.1386/JCP.5.1.135_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Published in the Journal of Contemporary Painting Volume (5): Issue (1) 2019, Models of Attention, was developed from a paper presented at the “Painting as Remodel: Revisiting ‘Painting as Model’\" symposium, Camberwell College of Art, UAL, 21 June 2018, that responded to Yve-Alain Bois’ seminal text ‘Painting as Model’, and opened by a keynote by Bois. \n \nThe JCP volume publishes newly translated texts by Bois alongside articles generated by the symposium. \n \nIn 'Models of Attention' the question posed by Yve-Alain Bois via Hubert Damisch in Painting as Model, ‘what is the mode of thought of which painting is the stake?’ (1990) is shifted to what is the mode of attention? Informed by current cognitive and neuropsychological research, paintings combative art history is assessed through the lens of attention. The unravelling of modernist painting is proposed as a conflict between models of attention, and divergent attentional expectations. Modernist values of immediacy, presentness, wholeness are considered conditions of an ideal attentional experience, one that attempts to hold back a partial, fragmented and distracted counter experience of modernity. Painting as Model argued for painting’s specificity, pulling away from a formalism that reduces painting to the visual, and theoretical structures that bypass the made object. This article proposes an attentional-specificity for painting; the limits of attentional capacity, distinctions between focused, distributed and divided attention correlating with the cognitive complexity held by the structural, spatial and material conditions of painting. \n \nYve-Alain Bois’ text Painting as Model, first published in 1990, is still cited as a key collection of essays, positioning painting as being both a conceptual and a material enquiry. The symposium and Journal edition responds to Bois's position that one must concentrate on both the formal elements of a work of art and its physical qualities to fully understand its totality and makes a significant contribution to contemporary discourses on painting.","PeriodicalId":40089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Painting","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Painting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/JCP.5.1.135_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Published in the Journal of Contemporary Painting Volume (5): Issue (1) 2019, Models of Attention, was developed from a paper presented at the “Painting as Remodel: Revisiting ‘Painting as Model’" symposium, Camberwell College of Art, UAL, 21 June 2018, that responded to Yve-Alain Bois’ seminal text ‘Painting as Model’, and opened by a keynote by Bois. The JCP volume publishes newly translated texts by Bois alongside articles generated by the symposium. In 'Models of Attention' the question posed by Yve-Alain Bois via Hubert Damisch in Painting as Model, ‘what is the mode of thought of which painting is the stake?’ (1990) is shifted to what is the mode of attention? Informed by current cognitive and neuropsychological research, paintings combative art history is assessed through the lens of attention. The unravelling of modernist painting is proposed as a conflict between models of attention, and divergent attentional expectations. Modernist values of immediacy, presentness, wholeness are considered conditions of an ideal attentional experience, one that attempts to hold back a partial, fragmented and distracted counter experience of modernity. Painting as Model argued for painting’s specificity, pulling away from a formalism that reduces painting to the visual, and theoretical structures that bypass the made object. This article proposes an attentional-specificity for painting; the limits of attentional capacity, distinctions between focused, distributed and divided attention correlating with the cognitive complexity held by the structural, spatial and material conditions of painting. Yve-Alain Bois’ text Painting as Model, first published in 1990, is still cited as a key collection of essays, positioning painting as being both a conceptual and a material enquiry. The symposium and Journal edition responds to Bois's position that one must concentrate on both the formal elements of a work of art and its physical qualities to fully understand its totality and makes a significant contribution to contemporary discourses on painting.
注意力模型
发表在《当代绘画杂志》卷(5):问题(1)2019年,关注的模型,是由一篇论文在“绘画作为改造:重新审视“绘画作为模型”研讨会上提出的,坎伯韦尔艺术学院,UAL, 2018年6月21日,回应了伊夫-阿兰·布瓦的开创性文本“绘画作为模型”,并由布瓦的主题演讲打开。JCP卷出版了Bois的新翻译文本以及研讨会产生的文章。在“注意力的模型”中,伊夫-阿兰·波依斯通过休伯特·达米施在《作为模型的绘画》中提出的问题,“什么是绘画的思维模式?(1990)转向了什么是注意力模式?通过当前的认知和神经心理学研究,通过注意力的镜头来评估绘画的战斗艺术史。现代主义绘画的解体被认为是一种注意力模式和分散的注意力期望之间的冲突。现代主义价值观的即时性、现场性、整体性被认为是一种理想的注意力体验的条件,这种体验试图阻止现代性的部分、碎片化和分散的反体验。作为模型的绘画主张绘画的特殊性,脱离了将绘画减少到视觉的形式主义,以及绕过制造对象的理论结构。本文提出了绘画的注意专一性;注意能力的限制,集中注意力、分散注意力和分散注意力之间的区别,与绘画的结构、空间和物质条件所持有的认知复杂性有关。Yve-Alain Bois的文本《绘画作为模型》于1990年首次出版,至今仍被引用为一本重要的文集,它将绘画定位为一种概念和物质的探索。研讨会和期刊版回应了Bois的立场,即一个人必须专注于艺术作品的形式元素和它的物理品质,以充分理解它的整体,并对当代绘画话语做出重大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信