Compliance in Review Attendance among Orthodontic Patients attending a Tertiary Level Health Care Centre

O. Temisanren, J. Ifesanya, A. Olatunji
{"title":"Compliance in Review Attendance among Orthodontic Patients attending a Tertiary Level Health Care Centre","authors":"O. Temisanren, J. Ifesanya, A. Olatunji","doi":"10.61172/ndj.v23i1.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Estimating patient compliance during orthodontic treatment cannot be overemphasized as timely and successful outcome of orthodontic treatment is dependent on it. This study assessed patients' compliance to orthodontic reviews at a tertiary care orthodontic clinic as well as explored various factors that may influence review attendance.Materials and Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from 133 patients' case notes as well as the clinic daily attendance records. Socio-demographic data and type of appliance used by patients was extracted. The pattern of punctuality (in days) to clinic attendance as prescribed by the managing orthodontist was also ascertained. Data were analysed using the SPSS version 22. Level of significance was set at p<0.05.Results: The mean age was 14.65 ± 5.98 years. Sixty-two (46.6%) patients were males while 71(53.4%) were females. Sixteen patients (12%) had removable appliances, 116(87.2%) had fixed appliances while only one person (0.8%) had both fixed and removable appliances. Eighty (60.2%)  attendees were resident within the state of the clinic's location while 53 (39.8%) resided outside the state. At the first review visit after treatment commenced, 92(69.2%) presented on time for review while 41 (30.8%) defaulted with a mean lag time of 49.0±49.0 days before presenting at the clinic. The total default time varied significantly with the number of visits and length of treatment time (p<0.001).Conclusion: Rate of default to orthodontic reviews was found to increase gradually from the 2nd visit and imparted negatively on treatment time. \n ","PeriodicalId":79241,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Dental Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61172/ndj.v23i1.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: Estimating patient compliance during orthodontic treatment cannot be overemphasized as timely and successful outcome of orthodontic treatment is dependent on it. This study assessed patients' compliance to orthodontic reviews at a tertiary care orthodontic clinic as well as explored various factors that may influence review attendance.Materials and Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from 133 patients' case notes as well as the clinic daily attendance records. Socio-demographic data and type of appliance used by patients was extracted. The pattern of punctuality (in days) to clinic attendance as prescribed by the managing orthodontist was also ascertained. Data were analysed using the SPSS version 22. Level of significance was set at p<0.05.Results: The mean age was 14.65 ± 5.98 years. Sixty-two (46.6%) patients were males while 71(53.4%) were females. Sixteen patients (12%) had removable appliances, 116(87.2%) had fixed appliances while only one person (0.8%) had both fixed and removable appliances. Eighty (60.2%)  attendees were resident within the state of the clinic's location while 53 (39.8%) resided outside the state. At the first review visit after treatment commenced, 92(69.2%) presented on time for review while 41 (30.8%) defaulted with a mean lag time of 49.0±49.0 days before presenting at the clinic. The total default time varied significantly with the number of visits and length of treatment time (p<0.001).Conclusion: Rate of default to orthodontic reviews was found to increase gradually from the 2nd visit and imparted negatively on treatment time.  
在三级保健中心接受正畸治疗的病人依从性调查
目的:评估患者在正畸治疗过程中的依从性再怎么强调也不为过,因为正畸治疗的及时和成功的结果取决于它。本研究评估了三级保健正畸诊所患者对正畸检查的依从性,并探讨了可能影响检查出勤率的各种因素。材料与方法:回顾性收集133例患者的病例记录及门诊日就诊记录。提取患者使用的社会人口统计数据和器械类型。还确定了管理正畸医生规定的准时(以天为单位)到诊所就诊的模式。数据分析使用SPSS版本22。p<0.05为显著性水平。结果:平均年龄14.65±5.98岁。男性62例(46.6%),女性71例(53.4%)。固定式矫治器16例(12%),固定式矫治器116例(87.2%),固定式矫治器和固定式矫治器同时使用1例(0.8%)。80名参加者(60.2%)居住在诊所所在地的州内,53名(39.8%)居住在州外。在治疗开始后的第一次复查中,92例(69.2%)患者按时就诊,41例(30.8%)患者未按时就诊,平均滞后时间为49.0±49.0天。总默认时间随就诊次数和治疗时间长短变化显著(p<0.001)。结论:从第二次就诊开始,正畸复查不履行率逐渐增加,并对治疗时间产生负向影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信