Sonic Commentary: Bonus Ghost Tracks

IF 0.2 4区 艺术学 Q2 Arts and Humanities
Veniero Rizzardi
{"title":"Sonic Commentary: Bonus Ghost Tracks","authors":"Veniero Rizzardi","doi":"10.1162/LMJ_E_01030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"companion to an issue of LMJ dedicated to “Memory and History,” the first thought that dawned on me—together with being flattered by his invitation—was that he had obviously turned to the “history guy” side of me more than to any other of my musical selves. A conversation followed with Nic, where I started to realize that maybe I had been wrong. When separated from one another, and literally taken, the very concepts of “memory” and “history” may suggest other meanings: “memory” could also be intended as a memory unit of a piece of hardware (think of how memory size had marked the development of music made with samplers, etc.) and, of course, “history” could be any history—of persons, things, ideas, machines, communities and so on. However, tempted by all these possible directions and, at the same time, reluctant to play around with concepts with a “too-much-smart” overly affected attitude, I had to surrender to the fact that my first impression had already started to orient, even if not too consciously, my criteria of choice. Only, I decided to revert—or subvert—the memory/history theme by focusing on different possible takes: oblivion, for instance, in both objective and subjective ways. Secondarily, I thought of activating my personal memory in connection with something that I would bring out as historically meaningful even if it had gone more-or-less unnoticed when it happened. Memory became the main theme, and, in all cases, history would be implied as a natural consequence. So, I determined that I would collect some rather obscure materials that I had come across in the remote or near past that could fit the theme in various ways. Most artists, especially composers, tend to quickly leave behind what they have just realized once they start to concentrate on a new creature. I have often observed—also as a musicologist—that, especially when many years go by and the artist happens to stumble upon one of her/his early work, almost or entirely forgotten as it would be, they experience the surprise of an exciting discovery. That is why I started to casually to ask some musician friends to activate their memories and each make an effort to recall something that they had produced in some remote moment of their career that was now, metaphorically or not, collecting dust somewhere. So, we have here artists who happily decided to brush such dust out of the music and found it beautiful or far more interesting than they expected. This is the case of Elliott Sharp, with a piece created some twenty years ago when he had just started to use ProTools—which, by the way, is the most recent piece in the collection, from 1994. It is also the case of Carl Stone, with a piece of the mid ’80s, which for a few years had been circulating only on demo cassettes. Carl had been unhappy both with the piece and its uncontrolled circulation, but—in another demonstration that sedimented memory can produce “wrong” recollections—he now finds the piece perfectly acceptable and has therefore made a new mix for the occasion. Also, for Claudio Ambrosini, this was the occasion to bring back to life, so to speak, an early exercise in electroacoustic composition that had a complex musical and theoretical background. Listening to the piece after 40 years was something that surprisingly, he admitted, ignited a reflection upon his present music. A special case in this group is represented by the track of Arke Sinth, an ensemble of four musicians and artists from Padua active in the years 1972–73, who subsequently went each his own way: computer and sound engineering, video art, theater, psychology. They all have been acquaintances of mine for many years, and two have become friends. It was a few years ago that one had mentioned in conversation an early experience in group composition and performance that he considered important for his artistic upbringing. He was still regretting that its life had been too short but, after all, those were times of feverish research and constant experimentation, so that it wasn’t possible to stay too long on a project—indeed, in the very same years, two of the members of the ensemble were lmj27 audio","PeriodicalId":42662,"journal":{"name":"LEONARDO MUSIC JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1162/LMJ_E_01030","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LEONARDO MUSIC JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/LMJ_E_01030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

companion to an issue of LMJ dedicated to “Memory and History,” the first thought that dawned on me—together with being flattered by his invitation—was that he had obviously turned to the “history guy” side of me more than to any other of my musical selves. A conversation followed with Nic, where I started to realize that maybe I had been wrong. When separated from one another, and literally taken, the very concepts of “memory” and “history” may suggest other meanings: “memory” could also be intended as a memory unit of a piece of hardware (think of how memory size had marked the development of music made with samplers, etc.) and, of course, “history” could be any history—of persons, things, ideas, machines, communities and so on. However, tempted by all these possible directions and, at the same time, reluctant to play around with concepts with a “too-much-smart” overly affected attitude, I had to surrender to the fact that my first impression had already started to orient, even if not too consciously, my criteria of choice. Only, I decided to revert—or subvert—the memory/history theme by focusing on different possible takes: oblivion, for instance, in both objective and subjective ways. Secondarily, I thought of activating my personal memory in connection with something that I would bring out as historically meaningful even if it had gone more-or-less unnoticed when it happened. Memory became the main theme, and, in all cases, history would be implied as a natural consequence. So, I determined that I would collect some rather obscure materials that I had come across in the remote or near past that could fit the theme in various ways. Most artists, especially composers, tend to quickly leave behind what they have just realized once they start to concentrate on a new creature. I have often observed—also as a musicologist—that, especially when many years go by and the artist happens to stumble upon one of her/his early work, almost or entirely forgotten as it would be, they experience the surprise of an exciting discovery. That is why I started to casually to ask some musician friends to activate their memories and each make an effort to recall something that they had produced in some remote moment of their career that was now, metaphorically or not, collecting dust somewhere. So, we have here artists who happily decided to brush such dust out of the music and found it beautiful or far more interesting than they expected. This is the case of Elliott Sharp, with a piece created some twenty years ago when he had just started to use ProTools—which, by the way, is the most recent piece in the collection, from 1994. It is also the case of Carl Stone, with a piece of the mid ’80s, which for a few years had been circulating only on demo cassettes. Carl had been unhappy both with the piece and its uncontrolled circulation, but—in another demonstration that sedimented memory can produce “wrong” recollections—he now finds the piece perfectly acceptable and has therefore made a new mix for the occasion. Also, for Claudio Ambrosini, this was the occasion to bring back to life, so to speak, an early exercise in electroacoustic composition that had a complex musical and theoretical background. Listening to the piece after 40 years was something that surprisingly, he admitted, ignited a reflection upon his present music. A special case in this group is represented by the track of Arke Sinth, an ensemble of four musicians and artists from Padua active in the years 1972–73, who subsequently went each his own way: computer and sound engineering, video art, theater, psychology. They all have been acquaintances of mine for many years, and two have become friends. It was a few years ago that one had mentioned in conversation an early experience in group composition and performance that he considered important for his artistic upbringing. He was still regretting that its life had been too short but, after all, those were times of feverish research and constant experimentation, so that it wasn’t possible to stay too long on a project—indeed, in the very same years, two of the members of the ensemble were lmj27 audio
声音评论:额外的鬼音轨
作为LMJ一期《记忆与历史》的配套,我第一个想到的是,他显然比我的任何其他音乐自我都更倾向于“历史人”的一面,同时也被他的邀请所折服。随后与尼克进行了一次对话,我开始意识到也许我错了。当从字面上看,“记忆”和“历史”这两个概念彼此分离时,可能会暗示其他含义:“记忆”也可以是一件硬件的记忆单元(想想记忆大小是如何标志着用采样器制作的音乐的发展的),当然,“历史”可以是任何历史——人、事物、思想、机器,然而,被所有这些可能的方向所诱惑,同时又不愿意以“太聪明”的过度做作的态度玩弄概念,我不得不屈服于这样一个事实,即我的第一印象已经开始确定我的选择标准,即使不是太自觉。只是,我决定通过关注不同的可能方式来还原或颠覆记忆/历史主题:例如,以客观和主观的方式遗忘。第二,我想激活我的个人记忆,让它与我认为具有历史意义的事情联系起来,即使它发生时或多或少没有被注意到。记忆成为了主题,在任何情况下,历史都会被视为一种自然的结果。因此,我决定收集一些我在遥远或近距离的过去遇到的相当晦涩的材料,这些材料可以以各种方式适应主题。大多数艺术家,尤其是作曲家,一旦开始专注于一种新的生物,往往会很快忘记他们刚刚意识到的东西。作为一名音乐学家,我经常观察到,尤其是多年过去了,艺术家偶然发现了她/他的早期作品,尽管几乎或完全被遗忘了,但他们会体验到一个令人兴奋的发现的惊喜。这就是为什么我开始随意地请一些音乐家朋友激活他们的记忆,每个人都努力回忆起他们在职业生涯的某个遥远时刻所产生的东西,无论是否隐喻,这些东西现在都在某个地方尘封。所以,我们这里的艺术家们很高兴地决定把音乐中的灰尘擦掉,并发现它比他们预期的要美丽或有趣得多。Elliott Sharp就是这样,他在大约20年前创作了一件作品,当时他刚刚开始使用ProTools——顺便说一句,这是1994年收藏的最新作品。卡尔·斯通(Carl Stone)也是如此,他有一首80年代中期的作品,几年来一直只在演示磁带上流传。卡尔对这首曲子及其不受控制的循环都感到不满,但在另一个证据中,沉淀的记忆会产生“错误”的回忆,他现在发现这首曲子完全可以接受,因此为这个场合制作了一个新的组合。此外,对于克劳迪奥·安布罗西尼来说,这是一个让他复活的机会,可以说,这是电声创作的早期练习,具有复杂的音乐和理论背景。他承认,40年后听这首歌令人惊讶地引发了人们对他现在音乐的反思。这一群体中的一个特例是Arke Sinth的曲目,这是一个由四位来自帕多瓦的音乐家和艺术家组成的合奏团,活跃于1972年至73年,他们随后各自走上了自己的道路:计算机和声音工程、视频艺术、戏剧和心理学。他们都是我多年的熟人,有两个人成了朋友。几年前,有人在谈话中提到了他早期在团体创作和表演方面的经历,他认为这对他的艺术成长很重要。他仍然后悔它的寿命太短,但毕竟,那是一个狂热研究和不断实验的时代,所以不可能在一个项目上停留太久——事实上,就在同一年,乐团的两名成员都是lmj27音频
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Leonardo Music Journal (LMJ), is the companion annual journal to Leonardo. LMJ is devoted to aesthetic and technical issues in contemporary music and the sonic arts. Each thematic issue features artists/writers from around the world, representing a wide range of stylistic viewpoints. Each volume includes the latest offering from the LMJ CD series—an exciting sampling of works chosen by a guest curator and accompanied by notes from the composers and performers. Institutional subscribers to Leonardo receive LMJ as part of a yearly subscription.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信