Non-inferiority of a hybrid outpatient rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial (HIRE, DRKS00028770).

BMC digital health Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-25 DOI:10.1186/s44247-023-00013-4
Richard Albers, Stella Lemke, Sebastian Knapp, Gert Krischak, Matthias Bethge
{"title":"Non-inferiority of a hybrid outpatient rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial (HIRE, DRKS00028770).","authors":"Richard Albers, Stella Lemke, Sebastian Knapp, Gert Krischak, Matthias Bethge","doi":"10.1186/s44247-023-00013-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physiotherapeutic telerehabilitation in various musculoskeletal and internal diseases, including back pain, might be comparable to face-to-face rehabilitation or better than non-rehabilitation. In Germany, a standardized back school for patients with chronic back pain is provided in outpatient rehabilitation centers. The effectiveness of this standardized back school was shown in a randomized controlled trial in face-to-face rehabilitation. This study examines non-inferiority of a hybrid rehabilitation applying a digital version of the standardized back school against a rehabilitation applying the face-to-face back school.</p><p><strong>Methods/design: </strong>We recruit 320 patients in eight German outpatient rehabilitation centers. Patients are randomized equally to the intervention and control groups. Patients aged 18 to 65 years with back pain are included. Patients lacking a suitable private electronic device and German language skills are excluded. Both groups receive the standardized back school as part of the 3-week rehabilitation program. The control group receives the back school conventionally in face-to-face meetings within the outpatient rehabilitation center. The intervention group receives the back school online using a private electronic device. Besides the back school, the patients participate in rehabilitation programs according to the German rehabilitation guideline for patients with chronic back pain. Hence, the term \"hybrid\" rehabilitation for the intervention group is used. The back school consists of seven modules. We assess data at four time points: start of rehabilitation, end of rehabilitation, 3 months after the end of rehabilitation and, 12 months after the end of rehabilitation. The primary outcome is pain self-efficacy. Secondary outcomes are, amongst others, motivational self-efficacy, cognitive and behavioral pain management, and disorder and treatment knowledge. Guided interviews with patients, physicians, physiotherapists and other health experts supplement our study with qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Discussion/aim: </strong>Our randomized controlled trial aims to demonstrate non-inferiority of the online back school, compared to conventional implementation of the back school.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00028770, April 05, 2022).</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44247-023-00013-4.</p>","PeriodicalId":72426,"journal":{"name":"BMC digital health","volume":" ","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10125254/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44247-023-00013-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physiotherapeutic telerehabilitation in various musculoskeletal and internal diseases, including back pain, might be comparable to face-to-face rehabilitation or better than non-rehabilitation. In Germany, a standardized back school for patients with chronic back pain is provided in outpatient rehabilitation centers. The effectiveness of this standardized back school was shown in a randomized controlled trial in face-to-face rehabilitation. This study examines non-inferiority of a hybrid rehabilitation applying a digital version of the standardized back school against a rehabilitation applying the face-to-face back school.

Methods/design: We recruit 320 patients in eight German outpatient rehabilitation centers. Patients are randomized equally to the intervention and control groups. Patients aged 18 to 65 years with back pain are included. Patients lacking a suitable private electronic device and German language skills are excluded. Both groups receive the standardized back school as part of the 3-week rehabilitation program. The control group receives the back school conventionally in face-to-face meetings within the outpatient rehabilitation center. The intervention group receives the back school online using a private electronic device. Besides the back school, the patients participate in rehabilitation programs according to the German rehabilitation guideline for patients with chronic back pain. Hence, the term "hybrid" rehabilitation for the intervention group is used. The back school consists of seven modules. We assess data at four time points: start of rehabilitation, end of rehabilitation, 3 months after the end of rehabilitation and, 12 months after the end of rehabilitation. The primary outcome is pain self-efficacy. Secondary outcomes are, amongst others, motivational self-efficacy, cognitive and behavioral pain management, and disorder and treatment knowledge. Guided interviews with patients, physicians, physiotherapists and other health experts supplement our study with qualitative data.

Discussion/aim: Our randomized controlled trial aims to demonstrate non-inferiority of the online back school, compared to conventional implementation of the back school.

Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00028770, April 05, 2022).

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44247-023-00013-4.

混合门诊康复的非效性:一项随机对照试验(HIRE, DRKS00028770)
背景:包括背痛在内的各种肌肉骨骼和内部疾病的物理治疗远程康复可能与面对面康复相当或优于非康复。在德国,门诊康复中心为慢性背痛患者提供标准化的背部学校。在面对面康复的随机对照试验中显示了这种标准化背校的有效性。本研究考察了采用数字版本标准化背校的混合康复与采用面对面背校的康复的非劣效性。方法/设计:我们在8个德国门诊康复中心招募320名患者。患者被随机分为干预组和对照组。患者年龄在18岁到65岁之间,伴有背痛。缺乏合适的私人电子设备和德语技能的患者被排除在外。作为为期三周的康复计划的一部分,两组人都接受了标准化的背校训练。对照组在门诊康复中心接受传统的面对面会议。干预组使用私人电子设备在线接收回校信息。除背部学校外,患者根据德国慢性背痛患者康复指南参加康复项目。因此,对干预组使用术语“混合”康复。后校由七个模块组成。我们在四个时间点评估数据:康复开始、康复结束、康复结束后3个月和康复结束后12个月。主要结果是疼痛自我效能。次要结果是,除其他外,动机自我效能,认知和行为疼痛管理,以及疾病和治疗知识。对病人、医生、理疗师和其他健康专家的指导访谈为我们的研究补充了定性数据。讨论/目的:我们的随机对照试验旨在证明在线背校与传统背校相比具有非劣效性。试验注册:德国临床试验注册(DRKS00028770, 2022年4月5日)。补充资料:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址:10.1186/s44247-023-00013-4。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信