Bond strength and micromorphology of resin-dentin interface of etch-and-rinse dentin bonding agents after 1-year of water storage

IF 1.68 Q2 Dentistry
Adriana Oliveira Carvalho, Renata Bacelar-Sá, Osvaldo Wodevotzky Jr., Gláucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano, Pascal Christophe Magne, Marcelo Giannini
{"title":"Bond strength and micromorphology of resin-dentin interface of etch-and-rinse dentin bonding agents after 1-year of water storage","authors":"Adriana Oliveira Carvalho,&nbsp;Renata Bacelar-Sá,&nbsp;Osvaldo Wodevotzky Jr.,&nbsp;Gláucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano,&nbsp;Pascal Christophe Magne,&nbsp;Marcelo Giannini","doi":"10.1186/s40563-016-0073-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study compared the microtensile bond strength (BS) and the micromorphology of resin-dentin interface (MI) of a conventional adhesive to two-steps etch-and-rinse bonding agents after 1?year of water storage. Twenty-eight human third molars were used (n?=?7). Teeth were divided into four groups (GCB: Gluma Comfort Bond; OPB: OptiBond FL; OCB: One Coat Bond SL; PUB: Peak Universal Bond). Specimens were tested in tension after 24?h or 1?year of water storage. Dentin BS strength data were analyzed by split-plot two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer tests (α?=?0.05). Water-storage for 1?year significantly decreased BS for OCB; however, no significant difference was noted between OCB and GCB and PUB adhesives after 1?year of water-storage. OPB showed the highest BS values at both storage times. All adhesives formed a hybrid layer with resin tags, and both interfacial structures were maintained after 1?year. However, degradation signals within interfacial structures were observed only for the adhesive with a bond strength reduction. BS test showed that only one adhesive declined after 1?year of water storage. The degradation of some structures of the interface collaborated this finding. The classic three-step etch-and-rinse (OPB) presented higher values of bond strength than GCB and OCB after 1?year, but it was not statistically different from PUB.</p>","PeriodicalId":464,"journal":{"name":"Applied Adhesion Science","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6800,"publicationDate":"2016-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40563-016-0073-5","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Adhesion Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40563-016-0073-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This study compared the microtensile bond strength (BS) and the micromorphology of resin-dentin interface (MI) of a conventional adhesive to two-steps etch-and-rinse bonding agents after 1?year of water storage. Twenty-eight human third molars were used (n?=?7). Teeth were divided into four groups (GCB: Gluma Comfort Bond; OPB: OptiBond FL; OCB: One Coat Bond SL; PUB: Peak Universal Bond). Specimens were tested in tension after 24?h or 1?year of water storage. Dentin BS strength data were analyzed by split-plot two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer tests (α?=?0.05). Water-storage for 1?year significantly decreased BS for OCB; however, no significant difference was noted between OCB and GCB and PUB adhesives after 1?year of water-storage. OPB showed the highest BS values at both storage times. All adhesives formed a hybrid layer with resin tags, and both interfacial structures were maintained after 1?year. However, degradation signals within interfacial structures were observed only for the adhesive with a bond strength reduction. BS test showed that only one adhesive declined after 1?year of water storage. The degradation of some structures of the interface collaborated this finding. The classic three-step etch-and-rinse (OPB) presented higher values of bond strength than GCB and OCB after 1?year, but it was not statistically different from PUB.

Abstract Image

蚀刻-冲洗型牙本质黏合剂1年后树脂-牙本质界面的黏结强度和微观形貌
本研究比较了传统胶粘剂与两步蚀刻-冲洗胶粘剂在1?蓄水年。使用人类第三磨牙28颗(n?=?7)。牙组分为四组(GCB: Gluma Comfort Bond;OPB: OptiBond FL;OCB:单涂层粘结剂SL;PUB:巅峰通用债券)。试件在24?H还是1?蓄水年。牙本质BS强度数据采用裂图双因素方差分析,并进行Tukey-Kramer检验(α?=?0.05)。1?年OCB BS显著降低;然而,在1个月后,OCB与GCB和PUB之间没有显著差异。蓄水年。OPB在两个贮藏时间的BS值均最高。所有胶粘剂与树脂标签形成杂化层,界面结构在1年半后保持不变。然而,界面结构内的降解信号仅在粘结强度降低的粘合剂中观察到。BS测试显示,在1?蓄水年。一些界面结构的退化有助于这一发现。经典的三步蚀刻-漂洗(OPB)在1?年,但与PUB无统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Adhesion Science
Applied Adhesion Science Dentistry-Dentistry (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Adhesion Science focuses on practical applications of adhesives, with special emphasis in fields such as oil industry, aerospace and biomedicine. Topics related to the phenomena of adhesion and the application of adhesive materials are welcome, especially in biomedical areas such as adhesive dentistry. Both theoretical and experimental works are considered for publication. Applied Adhesion Science is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. The journal''s open access policy offers a fast publication workflow whilst maintaining rigorous peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信