Scientific Literacy: A Proposal for Science Teacher Education

Susan Bruna Carneiro Aragão, M. R. Marcondes
{"title":"Scientific Literacy: A Proposal for Science Teacher Education","authors":"Susan Bruna Carneiro Aragão, M. R. Marcondes","doi":"10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2018.0390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scientific Literacy (SL) is a term used in many countries to define the purpose of science education. Based on previous research with undergraduate science students [1], an academic discipline in a teacher education program was developed in order to promote prospective teachers’ understanding about Scientific Literacy. The academic discipline content consisted of three approaches: ScienceTechnology-Society (STS), Inquiry, and History and Philosophy of Science (HPS). The research objective was investigated how undergraduate science students (future teachers) understand and reflect about the scientific literacy concept. This proposal was applied in a Brazilian Federal University located in the metropolitan area of São Paulo. Twelve students attended seventeen classes. They studied three different methodological approaches: Science, Technology and Society (STS), History and Philosophy of Science (HPS), and Inquiry. Some aspects of Nature of Science were also discussed. The researcher, a PhD student, elaborated levels of comprehension for each approach in order to analyze the results. The primary results so far indicated that some students were able to establish relationships among these approaches and their comprehension of each approach was dependent on the emphasis of the teacher educator.","PeriodicalId":90007,"journal":{"name":"Literacy information and computer education journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literacy information and computer education journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2018.0390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scientific Literacy (SL) is a term used in many countries to define the purpose of science education. Based on previous research with undergraduate science students [1], an academic discipline in a teacher education program was developed in order to promote prospective teachers’ understanding about Scientific Literacy. The academic discipline content consisted of three approaches: ScienceTechnology-Society (STS), Inquiry, and History and Philosophy of Science (HPS). The research objective was investigated how undergraduate science students (future teachers) understand and reflect about the scientific literacy concept. This proposal was applied in a Brazilian Federal University located in the metropolitan area of São Paulo. Twelve students attended seventeen classes. They studied three different methodological approaches: Science, Technology and Society (STS), History and Philosophy of Science (HPS), and Inquiry. Some aspects of Nature of Science were also discussed. The researcher, a PhD student, elaborated levels of comprehension for each approach in order to analyze the results. The primary results so far indicated that some students were able to establish relationships among these approaches and their comprehension of each approach was dependent on the emphasis of the teacher educator.
科学素养:对科学教师教育的建议
科学素养(science Literacy, SL)是许多国家用来定义科学教育目的的术语。本研究基于对本科理科生b[1]的研究,为促进未来教师对科学素养的理解,开发了一个教师教育计划中的学科。学科内容包括科学-技术-社会(STS)、探究(Inquiry)和科学历史与哲学(HPS)三种途径。本研究的目的是调查理科生(未来教师)对科学素养概念的理解和反思情况。这一建议在位于圣保罗市区的巴西联邦大学得到了应用。12个学生上17节课。他们研究了三种不同的方法论:科学、技术与社会(STS)、科学历史与哲学(HPS)和探究。还讨论了《科学的本质》的某些方面。研究人员是一名博士生,为了分析结果,他详细阐述了每种方法的理解水平。到目前为止的初步结果表明,一些学生能够建立这些方法之间的关系,他们对每种方法的理解取决于教师教育的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信