PATTERN OR RANDOM? CONTEXTUALISING ESTONIAN BRONZE AGE BRONZE STRAY FINDS ON THE LANDSCAPE

IF 0.6 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
K. Paavel
{"title":"PATTERN OR RANDOM? CONTEXTUALISING ESTONIAN BRONZE AGE BRONZE STRAY FINDS ON THE LANDSCAPE","authors":"K. Paavel","doi":"10.15181/AB.V24I0.1564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The vast majority of Estonian Bronze Age (1800–500 cal BC) large metal items (axes, spearheads, sickles) are single stray finds. In contrast, bronzes from settlements are mostly associated with on-site metal casting (casting waste and broken objects), and burial sites have yielded objects of a personal nature, e.g. tweezers, razors, and clothing-related items such as buttons. Some of the stray finds have been linked to possible settlement sites. Deposition in bodies of water has been suggested as an explanation for a couple of items. Although deemed to have been precious prestige items, the reasons for their seemingly contextless find situation have until now not been systematically explored. This study addresses the character of the find locations. To infer the original deposition environment, archive material and topographical and geological data were combined. The results indicate site-specific patterns in the distribution of artefacts, with a preference for wet contexts (especially rivers). This is particularly well illustrated by two regions with bronze items from both the Early and the Late Bronze Age: Kumna in northwest Estonia, and Reiu in southwest Estonia. The patterns noted suggest intentional human activities, possibly related to the phenomenon of depositing bronzes on the landscape, as is identified in other parts of Europe. Key words: stray bronze finds, Bronze Age, landscape, depositional customs, single depositions, multiple depositions, Estonia. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15181/ab.v24i0.1564","PeriodicalId":29741,"journal":{"name":"Archaeologia Baltica","volume":"24 1","pages":"26-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeologia Baltica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15181/AB.V24I0.1564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The vast majority of Estonian Bronze Age (1800–500 cal BC) large metal items (axes, spearheads, sickles) are single stray finds. In contrast, bronzes from settlements are mostly associated with on-site metal casting (casting waste and broken objects), and burial sites have yielded objects of a personal nature, e.g. tweezers, razors, and clothing-related items such as buttons. Some of the stray finds have been linked to possible settlement sites. Deposition in bodies of water has been suggested as an explanation for a couple of items. Although deemed to have been precious prestige items, the reasons for their seemingly contextless find situation have until now not been systematically explored. This study addresses the character of the find locations. To infer the original deposition environment, archive material and topographical and geological data were combined. The results indicate site-specific patterns in the distribution of artefacts, with a preference for wet contexts (especially rivers). This is particularly well illustrated by two regions with bronze items from both the Early and the Late Bronze Age: Kumna in northwest Estonia, and Reiu in southwest Estonia. The patterns noted suggest intentional human activities, possibly related to the phenomenon of depositing bronzes on the landscape, as is identified in other parts of Europe. Key words: stray bronze finds, Bronze Age, landscape, depositional customs, single depositions, multiple depositions, Estonia. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15181/ab.v24i0.1564
模式还是随机?在景观中发现的爱沙尼亚青铜器时代的青铜
绝大多数爱沙尼亚青铜器时代(公元前1800-500 cal)的大型金属物品(斧头、矛头、镰刀)都是偶然发现的。相比之下,从定居点发现的青铜器大多与现场金属铸造(铸造废料和破碎物品)有关,而埋葬地点出土的物品则属于个人物品,如镊子、剃须刀和与衣服有关的物品,如纽扣。一些流浪的发现与可能的定居点有关。水体中的沉积被认为是对一些现象的一种解释。虽然被认为是珍贵的声望物品,但直到现在,他们似乎没有上下文的发现情况的原因还没有被系统地探索。本研究探讨了发现地点的特点。将档案资料与地形地质资料相结合,推断出原始沉积环境。结果表明,人工制品的分布具有特定的地点模式,特别是在潮湿的环境中(特别是河流)。这一点在两个拥有青铜时代早期和晚期青铜器的地区得到了很好的说明:爱沙尼亚西北部的Kumna和爱沙尼亚西南部的Reiu。所注意到的模式表明有意的人类活动,可能与在景观上沉积青铜器的现象有关,正如在欧洲其他地区所发现的那样。关键词:流散青铜器发现,青铜器时代,景观,沉积习俗,单一沉积,多重沉积,爱沙尼亚DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15181/ab.v24i0.1564
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
75.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信