Critically Analysing the Ethical Dilemmas Arising from Lecturer and Student Relationships at the University: Pushing Social Boundaries for Institutional Revolution

Q3 Social Sciences
K. James, Richie Bain, N. Duncan, Michael Martin, James Mole, Michael Williamson, Blair Wilson
{"title":"Critically Analysing the Ethical Dilemmas Arising from Lecturer and Student Relationships at the University: Pushing Social Boundaries for Institutional Revolution","authors":"K. James, Richie Bain, N. Duncan, Michael Martin, James Mole, Michael Williamson, Blair Wilson","doi":"10.22521/EDUPIJ.2020.93.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The basis of the ethical dilemma discussed in this article is the controversy surrounding the personal relationship between a student and their lecturer. The social constructs of university highlight that the potential for any friendship or relationship within the institution is very uncommon and both parties usually assume that integration of their social groups cannot take place. Many people argue that the relationship of this nature can adversely affect grade attainment and fairness of judgement. We assess and reflect upon the merits of this conventional view by drawing upon a real-life case-study involving the first author (a lecturer) and the remaining six authors (his students). After considering the various arguments on both sides, and drawing upon authors such as Freud, Marx, and Sartre, we conclude that, if individuals remain honest, the relationship can only mean a greater understanding for the student and a lesser alienation complex for both parties.","PeriodicalId":30989,"journal":{"name":"Educational Process International Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"139-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Process International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22521/EDUPIJ.2020.93.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The basis of the ethical dilemma discussed in this article is the controversy surrounding the personal relationship between a student and their lecturer. The social constructs of university highlight that the potential for any friendship or relationship within the institution is very uncommon and both parties usually assume that integration of their social groups cannot take place. Many people argue that the relationship of this nature can adversely affect grade attainment and fairness of judgement. We assess and reflect upon the merits of this conventional view by drawing upon a real-life case-study involving the first author (a lecturer) and the remaining six authors (his students). After considering the various arguments on both sides, and drawing upon authors such as Freud, Marx, and Sartre, we conclude that, if individuals remain honest, the relationship can only mean a greater understanding for the student and a lesser alienation complex for both parties.
批判性地分析大学师生关系中产生的伦理困境:推动制度革命的社会边界
本文讨论的道德困境的基础是围绕学生和讲师之间的个人关系的争议。大学的社会结构强调,在这个机构内,任何友谊或关系的潜力都是非常罕见的,双方通常都认为他们的社会群体不可能实现融合。许多人认为,这种性质的关系会对成绩和判断的公平性产生不利影响。我们通过一个涉及第一作者(一位讲师)和其他六位作者(他的学生)的真实案例研究来评估和反思这种传统观点的优点。在考虑了双方的各种论点,并借鉴了弗洛伊德、马克思和萨特等作家的观点后,我们得出结论:如果个人保持诚实,这种关系只能意味着对学生有更大的理解,对双方来说,异化情结会更小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Process International Journal
Educational Process International Journal Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信