Running up the hill – long-term streaming video pilots: process, analysis and outcomes

IF 0.6 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Anita K. Foster, Gene R. Springs
{"title":"Running up the hill – long-term streaming video pilots: process, analysis and outcomes","authors":"Anita K. Foster, Gene R. Springs","doi":"10.1108/cc-12-2020-0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nAcademic libraries are struggling to support the growing demand for streaming video. The purpose of this paper is to detail the experience of running three long-term pilots with different streaming video platforms, including processes involved, lessons learned and next steps.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper uses a mixed methods approach, combining analysis of usage data with case study observations.\n\n\nFindings\nThe length of the pilots allowed for deep understanding of the needs of this academic library’s community’s engagement with streaming video in the classroom, and confirmed anecdotal information that availability of multiple platforms supports diverse needs which led to continuing access to all platforms, operationalized to be managed within existing processes. Using usage data and feedback from a task force led to decisions to continue with all three platforms that were piloted.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nWhile this research describes the experience at one academic library, the information may be generalizable enough that other libraries may use it for their streaming video collection development decisions.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nLong-term pilot studies for streaming video platforms can be challenging for many libraries to undertake. With a modest initial financial commitment, the library was able to explore how the community might use streaming video. Through analysis of usage data, the library was able to see when, where and what was being used and could make better informed decisions about where to concentrate future funds for streaming video support.\n","PeriodicalId":41029,"journal":{"name":"Collection and Curation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collection and Curation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cc-12-2020-0046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose Academic libraries are struggling to support the growing demand for streaming video. The purpose of this paper is to detail the experience of running three long-term pilots with different streaming video platforms, including processes involved, lessons learned and next steps. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses a mixed methods approach, combining analysis of usage data with case study observations. Findings The length of the pilots allowed for deep understanding of the needs of this academic library’s community’s engagement with streaming video in the classroom, and confirmed anecdotal information that availability of multiple platforms supports diverse needs which led to continuing access to all platforms, operationalized to be managed within existing processes. Using usage data and feedback from a task force led to decisions to continue with all three platforms that were piloted. Research limitations/implications While this research describes the experience at one academic library, the information may be generalizable enough that other libraries may use it for their streaming video collection development decisions. Originality/value Long-term pilot studies for streaming video platforms can be challenging for many libraries to undertake. With a modest initial financial commitment, the library was able to explore how the community might use streaming video. Through analysis of usage data, the library was able to see when, where and what was being used and could make better informed decisions about where to concentrate future funds for streaming video support.
向上奔跑——长期流媒体视频试点:过程、分析和结果
目的学术图书馆正在努力支持对流媒体视频日益增长的需求。本文的目的是详细介绍在不同流媒体视频平台上运行三个长期试点的经验,包括所涉及的过程、经验教训和下一步行动。设计/方法论/方法本文采用混合方法,将使用数据分析与案例研究观察相结合。发现试点的时间长度使我们能够深入了解该学术图书馆社区参与课堂流媒体视频的需求,并证实了传闻信息,即多个平台的可用性支持不同的需求,这导致了对所有平台的持续访问,并在现有流程内进行操作和管理。利用使用数据和工作组的反馈,决定继续使用所有三个试点平台。研究局限性/含义虽然这项研究描述了一家学术图书馆的经验,但这些信息可能足够普遍,其他图书馆可能会将其用于流媒体视频收藏的开发决策。原创性/价值流媒体视频平台的长期试点研究对许多图书馆来说可能具有挑战性。通过适度的初始财政承诺,图书馆能够探索社区如何使用流媒体视频。通过对使用数据的分析,图书馆能够了解何时、何地以及使用了什么,并能够就未来资金集中用于流媒体视频支持做出更明智的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Collection and Curation
Collection and Curation INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信