Set Theory and Many Worlds

Q2 Physics and Astronomy
P. Tappenden
{"title":"Set Theory and Many Worlds","authors":"P. Tappenden","doi":"10.3390/quantum5010016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2022 Tel Aviv conference on the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics highlighted many differences between theorists. A very significant dichotomy is between Everettian fission (splitting) and Saunders–Wallace–Wilson divergence. For fission, an observer may have multiple futures, whereas for divergence they always have a single future. Divergence was explicitly introduced to resolve the problem of pre-measurement uncertainty for Everettian theory, which is universally believed to be absent for fission. Here I maintain that there is indeed pre-measurement uncertainty prior to fission, so long as objective probability is a property of Everettian branches. This is made possible if the universe is a set and branches are subsets with a probability measure. A universe that is a set of universes that are macroscopically isomorphic and span all possible configurations of local beäbles fulfills that role. If objective probability is a property of branches, then a successful Deutsch–Wallace decision-theoretic argument would justify the Principal Principle and be part of probability theory rather than specific to many-worlds theory. Any macroscopic object in our environment becomes a set of isomorphs with different microscopic configurations, each in an elemental universe (elemental in the set-theoretic sense). This is similar to the many-interacting-worlds theory, but the observer inhabits the set of worlds, not an individual world. An observer has many elemental bodies.","PeriodicalId":34124,"journal":{"name":"Quantum Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantum Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/quantum5010016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The 2022 Tel Aviv conference on the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics highlighted many differences between theorists. A very significant dichotomy is between Everettian fission (splitting) and Saunders–Wallace–Wilson divergence. For fission, an observer may have multiple futures, whereas for divergence they always have a single future. Divergence was explicitly introduced to resolve the problem of pre-measurement uncertainty for Everettian theory, which is universally believed to be absent for fission. Here I maintain that there is indeed pre-measurement uncertainty prior to fission, so long as objective probability is a property of Everettian branches. This is made possible if the universe is a set and branches are subsets with a probability measure. A universe that is a set of universes that are macroscopically isomorphic and span all possible configurations of local beäbles fulfills that role. If objective probability is a property of branches, then a successful Deutsch–Wallace decision-theoretic argument would justify the Principal Principle and be part of probability theory rather than specific to many-worlds theory. Any macroscopic object in our environment becomes a set of isomorphs with different microscopic configurations, each in an elemental universe (elemental in the set-theoretic sense). This is similar to the many-interacting-worlds theory, but the observer inhabits the set of worlds, not an individual world. An observer has many elemental bodies.
集合论与许多世界
2022年特拉维夫量子力学多世界解释会议强调了理论家之间的许多差异。一个非常重要的二分法是埃弗雷特裂变(分裂)和桑德斯-华莱士-威尔逊分歧。对于裂变,观察者可能有多个未来,而对于分歧,他们总是有一个单一的未来。分歧被明确引入以解决埃弗雷特理论的测量前不确定度问题,这被普遍认为是裂变所不存在的。在这里,我坚持认为,在裂变之前确实存在测量前的不确定性,只要客观概率是埃弗雷特分支的一个性质。如果宇宙是一个集合,分支是具有概率测度的子集,则这是可能的。一个宇宙是一组宏观同构的宇宙,它跨越了局部元素的所有可能配置,从而实现了这一作用。如果客观概率是分支的一个性质,那么一个成功的Deutsch–Wallace决策理论论点将证明主原则的合理性,并成为概率论的一部分,而不是多世界理论的具体部分。我们环境中的任何宏观物体都会变成一组具有不同微观构型的同晶,每个同晶都在一个元素宇宙中(集合论意义上的元素)。这类似于许多相互作用的世界理论,但观察者居住在一组世界中,而不是一个单独的世界。观测者有许多基本的身体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quantum Reports
Quantum Reports Physics and Astronomy-Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信