Velferdsteknologi – fremtidens helsevesen med eller uten omsorg?

Stine Hauvik, Solfrid Vatne
{"title":"Velferdsteknologi – fremtidens helsevesen med eller uten omsorg?","authors":"Stine Hauvik, Solfrid Vatne","doi":"10.7557/14.4803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Welfare technology - healthcare in the future with or without care? \nIn the future, it will be a challenge to maintain today’s quality of care. Welfare technology may be a solution to reduce the expected care crisis. The public healthcare system is influenced by New Public Management ideals as” what can we afford? rather than “what are the patients` need”. Questions concerning patients’ rights and healthcare providers’ moral obligation seem to be less important. In the discussion Martinsen criticizes that caring has become a secondary term where patients` have less power. To increase the patient’s user involvement, Habermas suggests communicative discourse as a solution to the discrepancy between the public healthcare systems focus on earnings, and the patients’ need for care. ","PeriodicalId":30131,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk Tidsskrift for Helseforskning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordisk Tidsskrift for Helseforskning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7557/14.4803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Welfare technology - healthcare in the future with or without care? In the future, it will be a challenge to maintain today’s quality of care. Welfare technology may be a solution to reduce the expected care crisis. The public healthcare system is influenced by New Public Management ideals as” what can we afford? rather than “what are the patients` need”. Questions concerning patients’ rights and healthcare providers’ moral obligation seem to be less important. In the discussion Martinsen criticizes that caring has become a secondary term where patients` have less power. To increase the patient’s user involvement, Habermas suggests communicative discourse as a solution to the discrepancy between the public healthcare systems focus on earnings, and the patients’ need for care. 
欢迎技术,未来的健康之船,无论是否用心?
福利技术-未来的医疗保健有护理还是没有护理?在未来,保持今天的护理质量将是一个挑战。福利技术可能是减少预期护理危机的一种解决方案。公共医疗体系受到新公共管理理念的影响,即“我们能负担得起什么?”?而不是“病人需要什么”。有关患者权利和医疗保健提供者道德义务的问题似乎不那么重要。在讨论中,Martinsen批评说,护理已经成为一个次要术语,患者的权力越来越小。为了增加患者的用户参与度,哈贝马斯建议用交流话语来解决公共医疗系统对收入的关注与患者对护理的需求之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信