Independence in Financial Audit Engagements. The Case of Romanian Banks

G. Tănase, Aurelia Ștefănescu
{"title":"Independence in Financial Audit Engagements. The Case of Romanian Banks","authors":"G. Tănase, Aurelia Ștefănescu","doi":"10.20869/auditf/2020/157/001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the external audit to ensure the credibility of the financial statements, it is a mandatory and vital requirement to maintain the independence in audit engagements. In practice, when performing the audit engagements there are various threats to independence, such as the non-audit services, the financial dependence of the auditor on its client, and the familiarity between client and auditor. The risk they pose to independence may be diminished through the rotation policy of the partner and audit firm. The rotation (voluntary or compulsory of the partner or audit firm) generates, according to the professional literature, both advantages and disadvantages, the legal practices and regulations being different from one country to another. Although the Romanian legislation does not require the rotation within the audit engagements, we believe that adopting these practices is an indication of maintaining independence and conducting a quality audit. Starting from this aspect, our research aims at the rotation practices of the banking institutions operating on the Romanian market. The results show that most banks adopt their own rotation policy of the partner and audit firm. This research may be useful to interest-holders within the banking system, as well as to the regulatory bodies in Romania.","PeriodicalId":30958,"journal":{"name":"Audit Financiar","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audit Financiar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20869/auditf/2020/157/001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

For the external audit to ensure the credibility of the financial statements, it is a mandatory and vital requirement to maintain the independence in audit engagements. In practice, when performing the audit engagements there are various threats to independence, such as the non-audit services, the financial dependence of the auditor on its client, and the familiarity between client and auditor. The risk they pose to independence may be diminished through the rotation policy of the partner and audit firm. The rotation (voluntary or compulsory of the partner or audit firm) generates, according to the professional literature, both advantages and disadvantages, the legal practices and regulations being different from one country to another. Although the Romanian legislation does not require the rotation within the audit engagements, we believe that adopting these practices is an indication of maintaining independence and conducting a quality audit. Starting from this aspect, our research aims at the rotation practices of the banking institutions operating on the Romanian market. The results show that most banks adopt their own rotation policy of the partner and audit firm. This research may be useful to interest-holders within the banking system, as well as to the regulatory bodies in Romania.
财务审计业务的独立性。罗马尼亚银行案例
外部审计要确保财务报表的可信性,保持审计业务的独立性是一项必不可少的重要要求。在实践中,在执行审计业务时,存在各种对独立性的威胁,例如非审计服务、审计师对客户的财务依赖以及客户与审计师之间的熟悉程度。通过合伙人和审计事务所的轮换政策,他们对独立性构成的风险可能会减少。根据专业文献,合伙人或审计事务所的轮岗(自愿或强制)有利有弊,各国的法律惯例和法规不同。虽然罗马尼亚立法不要求在审计业务中轮换,但我们认为,采用这些做法表明保持独立性并进行高质量的审计。从这一方面出发,我们的研究针对的是罗马尼亚市场上银行机构的轮换实践。结果表明,大多数银行采用自己的合伙人与审计事务所轮岗政策。这项研究可能对银行系统内的利益持有人以及罗马尼亚的监管机构有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信