Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography for identification and evaluation of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws: a dosimetric and multimodal imaging comparison

Q4 Medicine
M. Barillari, A. Pardo, P. Faccioni, S. Guariglia, C. Cavedon, M. Zarantonello, F. Melloni, P. Zanutto, R. Bettini, G. Mansueto, N. Zerman, F. Lonardi
{"title":"Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography for identification and evaluation of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws: a dosimetric and multimodal imaging comparison","authors":"M. Barillari, A. Pardo, P. Faccioni, S. Guariglia, C. Cavedon, M. Zarantonello, F. Melloni, P. Zanutto, R. Bettini, G. Mansueto, N. Zerman, F. Lonardi","doi":"10.56609/jac.v41i1.273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to compare Orthopantomograms (OPT) and Computed Tomography (CT) with Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in patients with Medication-Related OsteoNecrosis of the Jaws (MRONJ). The study included 25 patients (6 males and 19 females) with MRONJ who had a history of long-term bisphosphonate therapy or one of the recently re-entered MRONJ drugs and underwent OPT, CT and/or CBCT for determination of the extent of disease. We excluded patients with maxillary neoplasia. Considering the presence of early and late signs, OPT was diagnostic in 6 out of 17 cases (35%), while CT and CBCT were diagnostic in 25 out of 25 cases (100%). Analysing the different radiant doses delivered by the selected radiological methods on a phantom, it was found that a more significant effective dose was spread by CT (2.6 mSv) than CBCT (0.164 mSv) or OPT (0.02 mSv). CBCT, from our experience, is a candidate to replace OPT in the first diagnostic step in patients with suspected MRONJ, generating less effective doses and artefacts from metal components than CT.","PeriodicalId":15008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied cosmetology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied cosmetology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56609/jac.v41i1.273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare Orthopantomograms (OPT) and Computed Tomography (CT) with Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in patients with Medication-Related OsteoNecrosis of the Jaws (MRONJ). The study included 25 patients (6 males and 19 females) with MRONJ who had a history of long-term bisphosphonate therapy or one of the recently re-entered MRONJ drugs and underwent OPT, CT and/or CBCT for determination of the extent of disease. We excluded patients with maxillary neoplasia. Considering the presence of early and late signs, OPT was diagnostic in 6 out of 17 cases (35%), while CT and CBCT were diagnostic in 25 out of 25 cases (100%). Analysing the different radiant doses delivered by the selected radiological methods on a phantom, it was found that a more significant effective dose was spread by CT (2.6 mSv) than CBCT (0.164 mSv) or OPT (0.02 mSv). CBCT, from our experience, is a candidate to replace OPT in the first diagnostic step in patients with suspected MRONJ, generating less effective doses and artefacts from metal components than CT.
锥形束计算机断层扫描在识别和评估药物相关颌骨坏死中的应用:剂量测定和多模式成像比较
本研究的目的是比较药物相关颌骨骨坏死(MRONJ)患者的正投影断层图(OPT)、计算机断层扫描(CT)和锥形束计算机断层摄影(CBCT)。该研究包括25名MRONJ患者(6名男性和19名女性),他们有长期双磷酸盐治疗史或最近重新使用MRONJ药物之一,并接受了OPT、CT和/或CBCT以确定疾病程度。我们排除了上颌肿瘤患者。考虑到早期和晚期体征的存在,17例中有6例(35%)诊断为OPT,25例中有25例(100%)诊断为CT和CBCT。通过分析所选放射方法在体模上提供的不同辐射剂量,发现CT(2.6 mSv)比CBCT(0.164 mSv)或OPT(0.02 mSv)传播的有效剂量更显著。根据我们的经验,CBCT是在疑似MRONJ患者的第一诊断步骤中取代OPT的候选者,与CT相比,CBCT从金属成分中产生的有效剂量和伪影更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of applied cosmetology
Journal of applied cosmetology Medicine-Dermatology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信