How Interviewers Affect Responses to Sensitive Questions on the Justification for Wife Beating, the Refusal to have Conjugal Sex, and Domestic Violence in India.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Abhishek Singh, Kaushalendra Kumar, F. Arnold
{"title":"How Interviewers Affect Responses to Sensitive Questions on the Justification for Wife Beating, the Refusal to have Conjugal Sex, and Domestic Violence in India.","authors":"Abhishek Singh, Kaushalendra Kumar, F. Arnold","doi":"10.1111/sifp.12193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite a general understanding that interviewers might cause measurement errors on sensitive questions in sample surveys, there is relatively little research on interviewer effects on responses to questions on women justifying a woman's refusal to have sex with her husband, women justifying wife beating, women's experience of physical and sexual violence, and whether the woman's father ever beat her mother. This study examines interviewer effects on these indicators that were collected in two large-scale National Family Health Surveys (NFHS) in India (2005-2006 and 2015-2016). We use cross-classified random intercept multivariable multilevel logit models to examine interviewer effects. In both surveys, we find large interviewer effects on questions about the justification of a woman refusing to have sex with her husband (32-33% in NFHS-3 and 45-46% in NFHS-4) and the justification of wife beating (27-28% in NFHS-3 and 33-34% in NFHS-4). The interviewer effects were much larger in the 2015-2016 survey than in the 2005-2006 survey. Such large interviewer effects should be considered when interpreting trends and patterns on these topics, especially since the interviewer effects might have changed between survey rounds. Understanding interviewer effects is important given the wide use of these surveys in policy formulation and monitoring in India.","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Family Planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12193","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Despite a general understanding that interviewers might cause measurement errors on sensitive questions in sample surveys, there is relatively little research on interviewer effects on responses to questions on women justifying a woman's refusal to have sex with her husband, women justifying wife beating, women's experience of physical and sexual violence, and whether the woman's father ever beat her mother. This study examines interviewer effects on these indicators that were collected in two large-scale National Family Health Surveys (NFHS) in India (2005-2006 and 2015-2016). We use cross-classified random intercept multivariable multilevel logit models to examine interviewer effects. In both surveys, we find large interviewer effects on questions about the justification of a woman refusing to have sex with her husband (32-33% in NFHS-3 and 45-46% in NFHS-4) and the justification of wife beating (27-28% in NFHS-3 and 33-34% in NFHS-4). The interviewer effects were much larger in the 2015-2016 survey than in the 2005-2006 survey. Such large interviewer effects should be considered when interpreting trends and patterns on these topics, especially since the interviewer effects might have changed between survey rounds. Understanding interviewer effects is important given the wide use of these surveys in policy formulation and monitoring in India.
采访者如何影响对印度殴打妻子、拒绝夫妻性行为和家庭暴力等敏感问题的回答。
尽管人们普遍认为,采访者可能会在抽样调查中的敏感问题上造成测量误差,但对采访者对以下问题回答的影响的研究相对较少:女性为拒绝与丈夫发生性关系辩护,女性为殴打妻子辩护,女性遭受身体暴力和性暴力的经历,以及女性的父亲是否殴打过她的母亲。本研究考察了访谈者对印度(2005-2006年和2015-2016年)两次大规模国家家庭健康调查(NFHS)中收集的这些指标的影响。我们使用交叉分类随机截距多变量多水平logit模型来检验访谈者的影响。在这两项调查中,我们发现在关于女性拒绝与丈夫发生性关系的理由(在NFHS-3中为32-33%,在NFHS-4中为45-46%)和殴打妻子的理由(在NFHS-3中为27-28%,在NFHS-4中为33-34%)的问题上,采访者的影响很大。在2015-2016年的调查中,访谈者的影响比2005-2006年的调查要大得多。在解释这些主题的趋势和模式时,应该考虑到如此大的采访者效应,特别是因为采访者效应可能在调查轮次之间发生变化。考虑到这些调查在印度政策制定和监测中的广泛使用,了解采访者的影响是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Studies in Family Planning publishes public health, social science, and biomedical research concerning sexual and reproductive health, fertility, and family planning, with a primary focus on developing countries. Each issue contains original research articles, reports, a commentary, book reviews, and a data section with findings for individual countries from the Demographic and Health Surveys.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信