The Integration of Public Health and Primary Care: A Case Study of Nebraska

P. David, G. Brandon, P. Valerie
{"title":"The Integration of Public Health and Primary Care: A Case Study of Nebraska","authors":"P. David, G. Brandon, P. Valerie","doi":"10.23937/2469-5793/1510122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study examined integration between local public health agencies and primary care clinics in Nebraska, highlighting progress to date, successes, opportunities, and barriers. Methods: The study included a survey of all 19 Local Health Departments (LHD) directors in Nebraska, and semistructured follow-up interviews with five LHD directors. Results: There is considerable evidence of integration activities between primary care clinics and LHDs. Current activities focus on care coordination for high-risk chronic care patients and promoting hypertension, diabetes, and cancer screening. Six LHDs have a formal contract or memorandum of understanding with one or more clinics, and at least two LHDs are embedding nurses within clinics. Although LHDs felt there were many benefits to integration and emerging opportunities, significant barriers persist, including funding, administrative capacity, and data sharing. Conclusions: Readiness to integrate public health and primary care services varies from one community to the next. Public health and primary care must continue to build partnerships and pilot new integration activities, while state agencies, universities, professional associations, and others must work to address funding and technical barriers. Public and private insurers should encourage clinics to screen patients for major risk factors, particularly social determinants of health, and provide incentives to improve individual and population health outcomes. More funding and technical assistance are needed to enhance integration activities. Future studies should evaluate the costs and benefits of integration projects from both the provider’s and the patient’s perspective, as well as organizational and systems perspectives.","PeriodicalId":91906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of family medicine and disease prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of family medicine and disease prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2469-5793/1510122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study examined integration between local public health agencies and primary care clinics in Nebraska, highlighting progress to date, successes, opportunities, and barriers. Methods: The study included a survey of all 19 Local Health Departments (LHD) directors in Nebraska, and semistructured follow-up interviews with five LHD directors. Results: There is considerable evidence of integration activities between primary care clinics and LHDs. Current activities focus on care coordination for high-risk chronic care patients and promoting hypertension, diabetes, and cancer screening. Six LHDs have a formal contract or memorandum of understanding with one or more clinics, and at least two LHDs are embedding nurses within clinics. Although LHDs felt there were many benefits to integration and emerging opportunities, significant barriers persist, including funding, administrative capacity, and data sharing. Conclusions: Readiness to integrate public health and primary care services varies from one community to the next. Public health and primary care must continue to build partnerships and pilot new integration activities, while state agencies, universities, professional associations, and others must work to address funding and technical barriers. Public and private insurers should encourage clinics to screen patients for major risk factors, particularly social determinants of health, and provide incentives to improve individual and population health outcomes. More funding and technical assistance are needed to enhance integration activities. Future studies should evaluate the costs and benefits of integration projects from both the provider’s and the patient’s perspective, as well as organizational and systems perspectives.
公共卫生与初级保健的整合:内布拉斯加州的个案研究
目的:这项研究考察了内布拉斯加州当地公共卫生机构和初级保健诊所之间的整合,强调了迄今为止的进展、成功、机会和障碍。方法:该研究包括对内布拉斯加州所有19个地方卫生部门(LHD)负责人的调查,以及对5个LHD负责人的半结构随访访谈。结果:有相当多的证据表明初级保健诊所和LHD之间存在整合活动。目前的活动侧重于高风险慢性病患者的护理协调,并促进高血压、糖尿病和癌症筛查。六名LHD与一家或多家诊所签订了正式合同或谅解备忘录,至少有两名LHD将护士安置在诊所内。尽管LHD认为整合和新兴机会有很多好处,但重大障碍依然存在,包括资金、行政能力和数据共享。结论:整合公共卫生和初级保健服务的准备情况因社区而异。公共卫生和初级保健必须继续建立伙伴关系并试点新的融合活动,而国家机构、大学、专业协会和其他机构必须努力解决资金和技术障碍。公共和私人保险公司应鼓励诊所筛查患者的主要风险因素,特别是健康的社会决定因素,并提供激励措施来改善个人和人群的健康结果。需要更多的资金和技术援助来加强一体化活动。未来的研究应该从提供者和患者的角度以及组织和系统的角度来评估整合项目的成本和收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信