Health and Gender: Quantifying the Unquantifiable

L. Carver
{"title":"Health and Gender: Quantifying the Unquantifiable","authors":"L. Carver","doi":"10.1108/S0275-495920180000036014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nPurpose \nThe measurement of gender in health research often consists of the substitution of the word “gender” in a question that is really asking about sex (physiological characteristics). When gender roles and expressions are actually measured it is normally with a tool such as the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI), which is time-consuming to complete and requires expertise to analyze. This study introduces a brief gender measure: a categorical, single-item, self-report, gender measure (SR-Gender), and demonstrates the validity and usability of this new tool. \n \n \nMethodology/approach \nThe SR-Gender was validated in two studies. Participants in Study One were 137 undergraduates. Concurrent criterion validity was assessed by an analysis comparing responses to the SR-Gender and the BSRI and an open-ended gender question. The goal was to ascertain whether the gender identities that these students reported in the SR-Gender were consistent with the classifications obtained on other gender measurement tools. In the second study, the SR-Gender was used with a group of adults over 65 years old in a study of aging with illness. \n \n \nFindings \nThis study established that the SR-Gender classifications of gender identity were consistent with the results obtained by the open-ended gender question and more complex BSRI measure. The SR-Gender was easily understood and used by younger and older adults, and resulted in nuanced gender classifications. \n \n \nResearch limitations/implications \nThe SR-Gender takes seconds to complete and provides health researchers with categorical gender classifications that can then be used in analysis of health outcomes, separately or in tandem with physiological sex. It treats masculinity and femininity as independent constructs and includes the potential for androgynous and undifferentiated responses. It is not recommended for in-depth gender research due to the simplicity of the tool. \n \n \nOriginality/value \nThis chapter introduces the SR-Gender, a simple, quick, and easy-to-use gender measure that could transform health research from paying lip service to gender to actual gender classification, allowing researchers to directly explore the impact of gender identity on health, separately or interacting with other social determinants of health.","PeriodicalId":74681,"journal":{"name":"Research in the sociology of health care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/S0275-495920180000036014","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in the sociology of health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0275-495920180000036014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The measurement of gender in health research often consists of the substitution of the word “gender” in a question that is really asking about sex (physiological characteristics). When gender roles and expressions are actually measured it is normally with a tool such as the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI), which is time-consuming to complete and requires expertise to analyze. This study introduces a brief gender measure: a categorical, single-item, self-report, gender measure (SR-Gender), and demonstrates the validity and usability of this new tool. Methodology/approach The SR-Gender was validated in two studies. Participants in Study One were 137 undergraduates. Concurrent criterion validity was assessed by an analysis comparing responses to the SR-Gender and the BSRI and an open-ended gender question. The goal was to ascertain whether the gender identities that these students reported in the SR-Gender were consistent with the classifications obtained on other gender measurement tools. In the second study, the SR-Gender was used with a group of adults over 65 years old in a study of aging with illness. Findings This study established that the SR-Gender classifications of gender identity were consistent with the results obtained by the open-ended gender question and more complex BSRI measure. The SR-Gender was easily understood and used by younger and older adults, and resulted in nuanced gender classifications. Research limitations/implications The SR-Gender takes seconds to complete and provides health researchers with categorical gender classifications that can then be used in analysis of health outcomes, separately or in tandem with physiological sex. It treats masculinity and femininity as independent constructs and includes the potential for androgynous and undifferentiated responses. It is not recommended for in-depth gender research due to the simplicity of the tool. Originality/value This chapter introduces the SR-Gender, a simple, quick, and easy-to-use gender measure that could transform health research from paying lip service to gender to actual gender classification, allowing researchers to directly explore the impact of gender identity on health, separately or interacting with other social determinants of health.
健康与性别:量化不可量化
目的在健康研究中对性别的测量通常包括在一个真正询问性别(生理特征)的问题中替换“性别”一词。当实际测量性别角色和表达时,通常是使用像Bem性别角色量表(BSRI)这样的工具,这是耗时的,需要专业知识来分析。本研究介绍了一种简单的性别测量:分类、单项、自我报告的性别测量(SR-Gender),并论证了这种新工具的有效性和可用性。方法/方法在两项研究中验证了SR-Gender。研究一的参与者是137名本科生。通过比较SR-Gender和BSRI的回答和开放式性别问题的分析来评估并发标准效度。目的是确定这些学生在SR-Gender中报告的性别认同是否与其他性别测量工具上获得的分类一致。在第二项研究中,SR-Gender被用于一组65岁以上的成年人,研究衰老与疾病。研究发现,性别认同的SR-Gender分类与开放式性别问题和更复杂的BSRI测量结果一致。SR-Gender很容易被年轻人和老年人理解和使用,并导致细微的性别分类。研究局限/影响SR-Gender只需几秒钟即可完成,它为卫生研究人员提供了分类的性别分类,可用于单独或与生理性别一起分析健康结果。它将男性气质和女性气质视为独立的构念,并包括雌雄同体和无差别反应的可能性。由于工具简单,不建议进行深入的性别研究。原创性/价值本章介绍了SR-Gender,这是一种简单、快速、易于使用的性别测量方法,可以将健康研究从口头上的性别分类转变为实际的性别分类,使研究人员能够直接探索性别认同对健康的影响,单独或与其他健康社会决定因素相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信