Transmigrating Soul Between the Presocratics and Plato

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Aither Pub Date : 2018-09-30 DOI:10.5507/aither.2018.006
Vojtěch Hladký
{"title":"Transmigrating Soul Between the Presocratics and Plato","authors":"Vojtěch Hladký","doi":"10.5507/aither.2018.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the nature of transmigrating soul in the early Greek thought, most notably in the thought of Empedocles and Philolaus. It argues that, in general, soul was conceived as a kind of subtle ‘matter’. The turning point Plato who strive to guarantee soul’s immortality by connecting it with transcendent, but also immaterial Forms. This accentuates the intellectual character of soul, and this holds also in eschatological context, but at the same time transforms the categories in which we tend to think about it until today. * This is an expanded and revised version of an article originally published in Czech as Hladký 2010. I would like to thank Eliška Fulínová, Jean-Claude Picot, Richard Seaford, Jiří Stránský, and Tomáš Vítek for their invaluable comments and suggestions. This work has been supported by Charles University Research Centre program No. 204056. For the Greek text of Empedocles and Philolaus, we use chiefly the classical edition by Diels and Kranz 1951–1952, from which, however, we often diverge and use Wright 1995 and Huffman 1993. On the subject of early Greek notion of the soul in general, one can recommend the following sources with further references: Rohde 1925, Furley 1956, Claus 1981, Bremmer 1983, 2002, 2010, Albinus 2000, and Lorenz 2009. The subject of transmigration and afterlife in particular is treated in Long 1948, Burkert 1995, and Drozdek 2011.","PeriodicalId":36348,"journal":{"name":"Aither","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aither","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5507/aither.2018.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article discusses the nature of transmigrating soul in the early Greek thought, most notably in the thought of Empedocles and Philolaus. It argues that, in general, soul was conceived as a kind of subtle ‘matter’. The turning point Plato who strive to guarantee soul’s immortality by connecting it with transcendent, but also immaterial Forms. This accentuates the intellectual character of soul, and this holds also in eschatological context, but at the same time transforms the categories in which we tend to think about it until today. * This is an expanded and revised version of an article originally published in Czech as Hladký 2010. I would like to thank Eliška Fulínová, Jean-Claude Picot, Richard Seaford, Jiří Stránský, and Tomáš Vítek for their invaluable comments and suggestions. This work has been supported by Charles University Research Centre program No. 204056. For the Greek text of Empedocles and Philolaus, we use chiefly the classical edition by Diels and Kranz 1951–1952, from which, however, we often diverge and use Wright 1995 and Huffman 1993. On the subject of early Greek notion of the soul in general, one can recommend the following sources with further references: Rohde 1925, Furley 1956, Claus 1981, Bremmer 1983, 2002, 2010, Albinus 2000, and Lorenz 2009. The subject of transmigration and afterlife in particular is treated in Long 1948, Burkert 1995, and Drozdek 2011.
前苏格拉底与柏拉图之间的灵魂轮回
本文论述了早期希腊思想中灵魂转世的本质,主要体现在恩培多克勒斯和菲洛劳斯的思想中。它认为,一般来说,灵魂被认为是一种微妙的“物质”。这是柏拉图的转折点,他试图通过将灵魂与超验的非物质形式联系起来来保证灵魂的不朽。这强调了灵魂的知性特征,这也适用于末世论的语境,但同时也改变了我们直到今天都倾向于思考灵魂的范畴。*这是一篇最初以捷克语Hladký 2010发表的文章的扩展和修订版本。我要感谢Eliška Fulínová、Jean-Claude Picot、Richard Seaford、Jiří Stránský和Tomáš Vítek提出的宝贵意见和建议。本研究得到了查尔斯大学研究中心项目(204056)的资助。对于恩培多克勒斯和菲洛劳斯的希腊文本,我们主要使用Diels和Kranz 1951-1952年的经典版本,然而,我们经常偏离并使用Wright 1995和Huffman 1993。关于早期希腊灵魂概念的主题,可以推荐以下资料来源,并进一步参考:Rohde 1925, Furley 1956, Claus 1981, Bremmer 1983, 2002, 2010, Albinus 2000, Lorenz 2009。Long(1948)、Burkert(1995)和Drozdek(2011)对轮回和来世的主题进行了特别的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aither
Aither Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信