Tuition as a Path for Affordability? The Pursuit of a Progressive Tuition Model at the University of California

J. Douglass, Patrick A. Lapid
{"title":"Tuition as a Path for Affordability? The Pursuit of a Progressive Tuition Model at the University of California","authors":"J. Douglass, Patrick A. Lapid","doi":"10.5070/P2CJPP10139471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Douglass, John Aubrey; Lapid, Patrick A. | Abstract: In an environment of declining public funding and rising tuition rates, many public universities in the US are moving toward a “progressive tuition model” that attempts to invest approximately one-third of tuition income into institutional financial aid for lower-income and middle-class students. The objective is to mitigate the cost of rising tuition and keep college affordable. But is this model as currently formulated working? Utilizing data from the Student Experience in the Research University (SERU) Survey of undergraduates and other data sources, this study explores these issues by focusing on students at the University of California (UC) and 10 research-intensive public institutions that are members of the SERU Consortium. Focusing mostly on survey data from 2014, we find that increases in tuition, and costs related to housing and other living expenses, have not had a significant negative impact on the number of lower-income students attending UC or on their behaviors. Since the onset of the Great Recession, there has been an actual increase in their number—a counterintuitive finding to the general perception that higher tuition equals less access for the economically vulnerable. At the same time, there is evidence of a “middle-class” squeeze, with a marginal drop in the number of students from this economic class. With these and other nuances and caveats discussed in this study, the progressive tuition model appears to have worked in terms of affordability and with only moderate indicators of increased financial stress and changed student behaviors. This study indicates that tuition can and should be a part of the search for a viable funding model for many public universities, like UC, and that demanding lower or no tuition does not appear to be based on any substantial analysis of the correlation of tuition and affordability.","PeriodicalId":89903,"journal":{"name":"California journal of politics and policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5070/P2CJPP10139471","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"California journal of politics and policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/P2CJPP10139471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Author(s): Douglass, John Aubrey; Lapid, Patrick A. | Abstract: In an environment of declining public funding and rising tuition rates, many public universities in the US are moving toward a “progressive tuition model” that attempts to invest approximately one-third of tuition income into institutional financial aid for lower-income and middle-class students. The objective is to mitigate the cost of rising tuition and keep college affordable. But is this model as currently formulated working? Utilizing data from the Student Experience in the Research University (SERU) Survey of undergraduates and other data sources, this study explores these issues by focusing on students at the University of California (UC) and 10 research-intensive public institutions that are members of the SERU Consortium. Focusing mostly on survey data from 2014, we find that increases in tuition, and costs related to housing and other living expenses, have not had a significant negative impact on the number of lower-income students attending UC or on their behaviors. Since the onset of the Great Recession, there has been an actual increase in their number—a counterintuitive finding to the general perception that higher tuition equals less access for the economically vulnerable. At the same time, there is evidence of a “middle-class” squeeze, with a marginal drop in the number of students from this economic class. With these and other nuances and caveats discussed in this study, the progressive tuition model appears to have worked in terms of affordability and with only moderate indicators of increased financial stress and changed student behaviors. This study indicates that tuition can and should be a part of the search for a viable funding model for many public universities, like UC, and that demanding lower or no tuition does not appear to be based on any substantial analysis of the correlation of tuition and affordability.
学费是经济实惠的途径?对加州大学渐进式学费模式的追求
作者:道格拉斯,约翰·奥布里;摘要:在公共资金不断减少、学费不断上涨的环境下,美国许多公立大学正在转向“渐进式学费模式”,即试图将大约三分之一的学费收入投入到低收入和中产阶级学生的机构经济援助中。这样做的目的是减轻学费上涨带来的成本,让学生能够负担得起大学学费。但是这个模型目前是否有效呢?利用研究型大学(SERU)本科生学生体验调查的数据和其他数据来源,本研究通过关注加州大学(UC)和作为研究型大学联盟成员的10个研究密集型公共机构的学生来探讨这些问题。主要关注2014年的调查数据,我们发现学费的增加,以及与住房和其他生活费用相关的成本,并没有对就读加州大学的低收入学生的数量或他们的行为产生显著的负面影响。自经济大衰退开始以来,他们的人数实际上有所增加——这一发现与人们普遍认为的更高的学费等于经济弱势群体获得的机会更少的看法相悖。与此同时,有证据表明“中产阶级”受到挤压,来自这个经济阶层的学生人数略有下降。考虑到这些以及本研究中讨论的其他细微差别和警告,渐进式学费模式似乎在可负担性方面发挥了作用,而且只有适度的经济压力增加和学生行为改变的指标。这项研究表明,学费可以而且应该成为许多公立大学(如加州大学)寻找可行资金模式的一部分,而要求更低或不收取学费似乎并没有基于对学费和可负担性之间相关性的任何实质性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书