Informed consent and living wills: comparative analysis of the legislation in Latin America.

Q3 Social Sciences
Revista de Bioetica y Derecho Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-15 DOI:10.1344/rbd2023.58.41678
Paola Buedo, Luciana Sanchez, María Paz Ojeda, María Nair Della Vedova, Bianca Labra, Rosana Sipitria, Luciano Centineo Aracil, Sandra Consentino, Ines Varela, Carlos Yabar Varas, Gladis Apaza, Adriana Krasnow, Silvia Vilchez, Florencia Luna
{"title":"Informed consent and living wills: comparative analysis of the legislation in Latin America.","authors":"Paola Buedo, Luciana Sanchez, María Paz Ojeda, María Nair Della Vedova, Bianca Labra, Rosana Sipitria, Luciano Centineo Aracil, Sandra Consentino, Ines Varela, Carlos Yabar Varas, Gladis Apaza, Adriana Krasnow, Silvia Vilchez, Florencia Luna","doi":"10.1344/rbd2023.58.41678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe how informed consent (IC) and living wills (LW) are legally established in Latin American countries in relation to health care and research, and to analyse that from bioethics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comparative analysis of the current regulations of the 21 Latin American countries regarding CI and LW was carried out. Data extraction reports were prepared before starting the research process for each country. Similarities and differences were qualitatively analyzed according to predefined variables. Tables were made to synthesize the information where possible.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen Latin American countries provide a specific criteria for IC use in clinical setting. Six countries have incorporated regulations regarding the use of IC in virtually environment. Regarding the use of IC in research, 20 Latin American countries provide a specific regulation. In the case of the academic exposure, 6 countries name this situation in their regulations. Seven Latin American countries have regulations to establish LW.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Latin America has presented a notable evolution around regulating two of the most important instruments of the exercise of autonomy, such as the CI and the DA. The legislation on both instruments does not guarantee that there is greater autonomy in health, but its existence as a regulator of actions for decision-making constitutes the first step for its exercise.</p>","PeriodicalId":52269,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Bioetica y Derecho","volume":" ","pages":"25-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11661847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Bioetica y Derecho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1344/rbd2023.58.41678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To describe how informed consent (IC) and living wills (LW) are legally established in Latin American countries in relation to health care and research, and to analyse that from bioethics.

Methods: A comparative analysis of the current regulations of the 21 Latin American countries regarding CI and LW was carried out. Data extraction reports were prepared before starting the research process for each country. Similarities and differences were qualitatively analyzed according to predefined variables. Tables were made to synthesize the information where possible.

Results: Eighteen Latin American countries provide a specific criteria for IC use in clinical setting. Six countries have incorporated regulations regarding the use of IC in virtually environment. Regarding the use of IC in research, 20 Latin American countries provide a specific regulation. In the case of the academic exposure, 6 countries name this situation in their regulations. Seven Latin American countries have regulations to establish LW.

Conclusions: Latin America has presented a notable evolution around regulating two of the most important instruments of the exercise of autonomy, such as the CI and the DA. The legislation on both instruments does not guarantee that there is greater autonomy in health, but its existence as a regulator of actions for decision-making constitutes the first step for its exercise.

知情同意和预先指示:拉丁美洲立法的比较分析
目的:描述拉丁美洲国家在医疗保健和研究方面如何规范知情同意(ic)和预先指示(ad),并从生命伦理学的角度进行分析。方法:对21个拉丁美洲国家关于ic和da的现行法规进行比较分析,并在每个国家开始研究过程之前设计数据提取报告。定性分析了预定义变量的异同。在可能的情况下制作表格来综合信息。结果:18个拉丁美洲国家制定了临床ic使用的具体标准。六个国家已经纳入了关于在虚拟环境中使用集成电路的规定。关于在研究中使用集成电路,20个拉丁美洲国家为这一领域制定了具体的标准。在学术展览方面,有6个国家在规定中提到了这种情况。七个拉丁美洲国家具备规范建立DA.显著的结论:拉丁美洲已围绕对进化的两个最重要的乐器,如行使自主权是智商和DA.法这两种文件不保证更大的自主权在健康,但它的存在作为股票监管决策是对行使这些权利的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de Bioetica y Derecho
Revista de Bioetica y Derecho Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信