Accommodations and academic performance: First-year university students with disabilities

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
J. Parsons, M. McColl, Andrea K. Martin, D. Rynard
{"title":"Accommodations and academic performance: First-year university students with disabilities","authors":"J. Parsons, M. McColl, Andrea K. Martin, D. Rynard","doi":"10.47678/CJHE.VI0.188985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite growing enrollment of university students with disabilities, they have not achieved academic parity with their non-disabled peers. This study matched 71 first-year university students with disabilities and students without disabilities on three variables: high school average when admitted to university, gender, and program of study. Both groups of students were compared on three measures of academic performance: GPA, failed courses, and dropped courses after first year of university. The relationship between accommodations and academic performance was also analyzed for students with disabilities. Evenwhen matched on admission average, gender, and program of study, students with disabilities had a significantly lower GPA and were more likely to fail courses in their first year than their peers without disabilities. While note-taking in the classroom was associated with being less likely to drop a course, it was also associated with poorer academic performance, as was using a calculator or alternate format during exams. The more accommodations students lost in the transition from high school, the worse they performed academically at university. Students who lost human assistant support in the classroom and theuse of a computer or a memory aid during exams had a significantly lower GPA and were more likely to fail courses in their first year of university compared with students who did not lose these accommodations. These findings have implications for accessibility offices and universities in supporting the access needs and academic success of students with disabilities.","PeriodicalId":45878,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47678/CJHE.VI0.188985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Despite growing enrollment of university students with disabilities, they have not achieved academic parity with their non-disabled peers. This study matched 71 first-year university students with disabilities and students without disabilities on three variables: high school average when admitted to university, gender, and program of study. Both groups of students were compared on three measures of academic performance: GPA, failed courses, and dropped courses after first year of university. The relationship between accommodations and academic performance was also analyzed for students with disabilities. Evenwhen matched on admission average, gender, and program of study, students with disabilities had a significantly lower GPA and were more likely to fail courses in their first year than their peers without disabilities. While note-taking in the classroom was associated with being less likely to drop a course, it was also associated with poorer academic performance, as was using a calculator or alternate format during exams. The more accommodations students lost in the transition from high school, the worse they performed academically at university. Students who lost human assistant support in the classroom and theuse of a computer or a memory aid during exams had a significantly lower GPA and were more likely to fail courses in their first year of university compared with students who did not lose these accommodations. These findings have implications for accessibility offices and universities in supporting the access needs and academic success of students with disabilities.
住宿和学习成绩:残疾大学生一年级
尽管残疾大学生的入学人数不断增加,但他们在学业上与非残疾同龄人并不平等。这项研究在三个变量上匹配了71名残疾大学生和非残疾大学生:高中录取时的平均水平、性别和学习项目。两组学生在学业成绩的三个指标上进行了比较:GPA、不及格课程和大学一年级后放弃课程。还分析了残疾学生的住宿条件与学习成绩之间的关系。即使在录取平均数、性别和学习项目上匹配,残疾学生的GPA也明显较低,而且在第一年比非残疾学生更有可能不及格。虽然在课堂上记笔记与不太可能放弃课程有关,但它也与较差的学习成绩有关,就像在考试中使用计算器或其他格式一样。学生在高中过渡期间失去的住宿越多,他们在大学的学业表现就越差。与没有失去这些便利的学生相比,在课堂上失去人力助理支持、在考试中使用计算机或记忆辅助的学生的平均成绩明显较低,在大学一年级更容易不及格。这些发现对无障碍办公室和大学支持残疾学生的无障碍需求和学业成功具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Higher Education
Canadian Journal of Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
44 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信