The Development of Higher Education in China and Malaysia: A Comparative Perspective

Chen Li
{"title":"The Development of Higher Education in China and Malaysia: A Comparative Perspective","authors":"Chen Li","doi":"10.11648/J.SJEDU.20210903.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the 1990s, higher education in the developing countries has gone through great changes in response to their fundamental political and socio-economic reforms. China and Malaysia, the two main Asian developing countries with emerging economies and ambitious goals, were picked up for a comparison of higher education development to better illustrate this general trend. In this comparative framework, comparability about the two countries is analyzed firstly, followed by the consideration of three key dimensions, and George Bereday’s method of comparison is accordingly used. It is noted from the comparison that both Chinese and Malaysian higher education systems have experienced massification, marketization and internationalization, and are currently striding toward universalization with more excellence-driven initiatives of higher education, which involve the main mechanisms and rules, as well as strategies and policies of marketization and internationalization. Yet other than the commonalities at a macro level, in these three areas concerning higher education there are some remarkable differences and disparities, such as the actual paths of size expansion, the growth and fate of private institutions, the conception of internationalization, due to different historical paths, national agendas and socio-political environments. Along this comparative approach, there are three common issues that need further elaborate discussions, namely, the unbalanced structure of quantitative development, centralized decentralization, and internationalization at home.","PeriodicalId":93370,"journal":{"name":"Science journal of education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science journal of education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.SJEDU.20210903.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the 1990s, higher education in the developing countries has gone through great changes in response to their fundamental political and socio-economic reforms. China and Malaysia, the two main Asian developing countries with emerging economies and ambitious goals, were picked up for a comparison of higher education development to better illustrate this general trend. In this comparative framework, comparability about the two countries is analyzed firstly, followed by the consideration of three key dimensions, and George Bereday’s method of comparison is accordingly used. It is noted from the comparison that both Chinese and Malaysian higher education systems have experienced massification, marketization and internationalization, and are currently striding toward universalization with more excellence-driven initiatives of higher education, which involve the main mechanisms and rules, as well as strategies and policies of marketization and internationalization. Yet other than the commonalities at a macro level, in these three areas concerning higher education there are some remarkable differences and disparities, such as the actual paths of size expansion, the growth and fate of private institutions, the conception of internationalization, due to different historical paths, national agendas and socio-political environments. Along this comparative approach, there are three common issues that need further elaborate discussions, namely, the unbalanced structure of quantitative development, centralized decentralization, and internationalization at home.
中国与马来西亚高等教育的发展:比较视角
自20世纪90年代以来,发展中国家的高等教育经历了巨大的变化,以应对其根本的政治和社会经济改革。中国和马来西亚这两个主要的亚洲发展中国家拥有新兴经济体和雄心勃勃的目标,他们被选中对高等教育发展进行比较,以更好地说明这一总体趋势。在这个比较框架中,首先分析了两国的可比性,然后考虑了三个关键维度,并相应地使用了乔治·贝雷迪的比较方法。从比较中可以看出,中马两国的高等教育体系都经历了大众化、市场化和国际化,目前正朝着普遍化迈进,高等教育的举措更加以卓越为导向,涉及到主要的机制和规则,以及市场化和国际化的战略和政策。然而,除了宏观层面的共性之外,由于不同的历史路径、国家议程和社会政治环境,这三个高等教育领域还存在一些显著的差异和差异,如规模扩张的实际路径、私立机构的成长和命运、国际化的概念。按照这种比较方法,有三个共同的问题需要进一步详细讨论,即数量发展的不平衡结构、集中的权力下放和国内的国际化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信