A Critical Review of the Sustainability of South Africa's Health System, User’s Satisfaction and Key Performance Scores

S. Gani
{"title":"A Critical Review of the Sustainability of South Africa's Health System, User’s Satisfaction and Key Performance Scores","authors":"S. Gani","doi":"10.38142/ijesss.v4i3.419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The South African Government has made accessibility and equity the primary focus of its health policy objectives since 1994. However, the extent to which these policies achieve their aims of lessening inequality is not synthetically documented. This study critically reviews and synthesises the literature on the nature of the South African health system, user’s satisfaction and key performance scores. The study conducted a content analysis of several research papers and policy papers in the South African health sector. The review showed that the current health system is dualistic, indicating that the public health system is not living up to the National Core Scores and that this has impacted negatively on the level of satisfaction of households. The evidence demonstrated ongoing discrepancies in access to and use of health services, notwithstanding legislative initiatives. Moreover, the review showed that user’s perceptions of the quality of public healthcare services are deteriorating in South Africa. There is evidence of treatment delays, long waiting times, acute shortages of doctors, specialists and nurses, a lack of appropriate medication and poor health services delivery. The evidence provided about the South African health system can contribute to global policy discussions about health equity on the use of health services by households from different socioeconomic backgrounds and how policies can increase access to quality health care for low-income households. \n  \n ","PeriodicalId":34642,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Sustainability and Social Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Sustainability and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v4i3.419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The South African Government has made accessibility and equity the primary focus of its health policy objectives since 1994. However, the extent to which these policies achieve their aims of lessening inequality is not synthetically documented. This study critically reviews and synthesises the literature on the nature of the South African health system, user’s satisfaction and key performance scores. The study conducted a content analysis of several research papers and policy papers in the South African health sector. The review showed that the current health system is dualistic, indicating that the public health system is not living up to the National Core Scores and that this has impacted negatively on the level of satisfaction of households. The evidence demonstrated ongoing discrepancies in access to and use of health services, notwithstanding legislative initiatives. Moreover, the review showed that user’s perceptions of the quality of public healthcare services are deteriorating in South Africa. There is evidence of treatment delays, long waiting times, acute shortages of doctors, specialists and nurses, a lack of appropriate medication and poor health services delivery. The evidence provided about the South African health system can contribute to global policy discussions about health equity on the use of health services by households from different socioeconomic backgrounds and how policies can increase access to quality health care for low-income households.    
对南非卫生系统的可持续性、用户满意度和关键绩效评分的批判性审查
自1994年以来,南非政府将无障碍和公平作为其卫生政策目标的首要重点。然而,这些政策在多大程度上实现了减少不平等的目标,并没有综合记录。本研究批判性地回顾和综合了有关南非卫生系统性质、用户满意度和关键绩效分数的文献。该研究对南非卫生部门的若干研究论文和政策文件进行了内容分析。审查表明,目前的卫生系统是二元的,表明公共卫生系统没有达到国家核心分数,这对家庭满意度产生了负面影响。证据表明,尽管采取了立法举措,但在获得和使用保健服务方面仍然存在差异。此外,审查表明,南非用户对公共保健服务质量的看法正在恶化。有证据表明,存在治疗延误、等待时间过长、医生、专家和护士严重短缺、缺乏适当药物以及卫生服务提供不良等问题。所提供的有关南非卫生系统的证据可以促进关于来自不同社会经济背景的家庭使用卫生服务的卫生公平以及政策如何增加低收入家庭获得优质卫生保健的机会的全球政策讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信