Joint Decision-Making and Team Outcomes: Examining Cross-Lagged Relationships and the Roles of Psychological Safety and Participative Leadership

IF 2.9 4区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED

Human Performance Pub Date : 2023-05-04 DOI:10.1080/08959285.2023.2208362

Yasir Mansoor Kundi, Subhan Shahid

{"title":"Joint Decision-Making and Team Outcomes: Examining Cross-Lagged Relationships and the Roles of Psychological Safety and Participative Leadership","authors":"Yasir Mansoor Kundi, Subhan Shahid","doi":"10.1080/08959285.2023.2208362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Despite increasing studies on team creativity, the relationship between joint decision-making and team creativity needs further exploration. Our study employs social exchange theory to investigate the potential bidirectional association between joint decision-making and team psychological safety while also exploring the role of participative leadership as a contextual constraint on this relationship. Through our analysis, we aim to shed light on the vital role of team psychological safety in mediating the moderating effect of participative leadership on the linkage between joint decision-making and team creativity. We test our hypotheses using a sample of 372 employees in 75 teams with a time-lagged research design. Our results demonstrated that joint decision-making is positively related to team psychological safety, and participative leadership strengthened the association between joint decision-making and team psychological safety and the association between joint decision-making and team creativity via team psychological safety. Overall, our findings suggest that team creativity could be improved if leaders can enhance their participative behaviors and identify appropriate channels for employees to feel psychologically safe in the workplace.","PeriodicalId":47825,"journal":{"name":"Human Performance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Performance","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2023.2208362","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite increasing studies on team creativity, the relationship between joint decision-making and team creativity needs further exploration. Our study employs social exchange theory to investigate the potential bidirectional association between joint decision-making and team psychological safety while also exploring the role of participative leadership as a contextual constraint on this relationship. Through our analysis, we aim to shed light on the vital role of team psychological safety in mediating the moderating effect of participative leadership on the linkage between joint decision-making and team creativity. We test our hypotheses using a sample of 372 employees in 75 teams with a time-lagged research design. Our results demonstrated that joint decision-making is positively related to team psychological safety, and participative leadership strengthened the association between joint decision-making and team psychological safety and the association between joint decision-making and team creativity via team psychological safety. Overall, our findings suggest that team creativity could be improved if leaders can enhance their participative behaviors and identify appropriate channels for employees to feel psychologically safe in the workplace.

查看原文本刊更多论文

联合决策与团队成果:心理安全和参与式领导的交叉滞后关系及作用检验

尽管对团队创造力的研究越来越多，但联合决策与团队创造力之间的关系仍有待进一步探索。我们的研究采用社会交换理论来研究联合决策与团队心理安全之间潜在的双向关联，同时也探讨了参与型领导作为这种关系的情境约束的作用。通过我们的分析，我们旨在阐明团队心理安全在参与型领导对联合决策和团队创造力之间联系的调节作用中的重要作用。我们使用75个团队的372名员工样本，采用时滞研究设计来检验我们的假设。我们的研究结果表明，联合决策与团队心理安全呈正相关，参与型领导通过团队心理安全增强了联合决策与球队心理安全之间的关联，以及联合决策与队创之间的关联。总的来说，我们的研究结果表明，如果领导者能够增强他们的参与行为，并为员工在工作场所找到适当的心理安全渠道，那么团队创造力可以得到提高。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Human Performance PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Human Performance publishes research investigating the nature and role of performance in the workplace and in organizational settings and offers a rich variety of information going beyond the study of traditional job behavior. Dedicated to presenting original research, theory, and measurement methods, the journal investigates individual, team, and firm level performance factors that influence work and organizational effectiveness. Human Performance is a respected forum for behavioral scientists interested in variables that motivate and promote high-level human performance, particularly in organizational and occupational settings. The journal seeks to identify and stimulate relevant research, communication, and theory concerning human capabilities and effectiveness. It serves as a valuable intellectual link between such disciplines as industrial-organizational psychology, individual differences, work physiology, organizational behavior, human resource management, and human factors.