Does “Social” Mean “Public”?

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Wit Hubert, A. Wagner
{"title":"Does “Social” Mean “Public”?","authors":"Wit Hubert, A. Wagner","doi":"10.3167/nc.2023.180104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe article presents an analysis of the use of Facebook on the over 400-day-long anti-fracking protest by farmers in the village of Żurawlów in Poland against the global corporation Chevron. Analysis of this case study was used to discuss the deliberative potential of social media and their power in countering hegemonic discourse and providing visibility in the public sphere to actors and arguments marginalized or excluded by the traditional media. The results discuss Facebook's potential for mobilizing and providing identity while emphasizing the problem of visibility in the public sphere, which was key to the inclusion of discourse in public debate. Harnessing emotions and legitimizing minority interests helped create counter-power, while polarization and “homophile acts” against deliberation geared toward arriving at an agreement.","PeriodicalId":46069,"journal":{"name":"Nature + Culture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature + Culture","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2023.180104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents an analysis of the use of Facebook on the over 400-day-long anti-fracking protest by farmers in the village of Żurawlów in Poland against the global corporation Chevron. Analysis of this case study was used to discuss the deliberative potential of social media and their power in countering hegemonic discourse and providing visibility in the public sphere to actors and arguments marginalized or excluded by the traditional media. The results discuss Facebook's potential for mobilizing and providing identity while emphasizing the problem of visibility in the public sphere, which was key to the inclusion of discourse in public debate. Harnessing emotions and legitimizing minority interests helped create counter-power, while polarization and “homophile acts” against deliberation geared toward arriving at an agreement.
“社会”是指“公共”吗?
这篇文章分析了Facebook在波兰Żurawlów村的农民针对全球公司雪佛龙长达400多天的反水力压裂抗议活动中的使用情况。通过对这一案例研究的分析,我们讨论了社交媒体的审议潜力,以及它们在对抗霸权话语、为被传统媒体边缘化或排斥的行动者和论点提供公共领域能见度方面的力量。研究结果讨论了Facebook在动员和提供身份认同方面的潜力,同时强调了公共领域的可见性问题,这是将话语纳入公共辩论的关键。利用情绪和使少数群体的利益合法化有助于产生反制力量,而两极分化和“亲同行为”则不利于旨在达成协议的审议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature + Culture
Nature + Culture ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信