Basal and Bolus Insulin Distribution According to Treatment Modality: Data from SWEET Diabetes Registry

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Ferda Evin, S. Tittel, B. Piccini, R. Cardona-Hernández, D. Mul, Nicole Sheanon, T. von dem Berge, Vit Neuman, M. Tauschmann, D. Gökşen
{"title":"Basal and Bolus Insulin Distribution According to Treatment Modality: Data from SWEET Diabetes Registry","authors":"Ferda Evin, S. Tittel, B. Piccini, R. Cardona-Hernández, D. Mul, Nicole Sheanon, T. von dem Berge, Vit Neuman, M. Tauschmann, D. Gökşen","doi":"10.1155/2023/8837506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims. The optimal basal and bolus insulin distribution in type 1 diabetes (T1D) is still controversial. Herein, we aimed to determine the variability of basal to total daily insulin dose according to treatment modality and diabetes technologies from the Better Control in Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes: Working to Create Centers of Reference (SWEET) registry. Methods. The study cohort was generated by using the SWEET database. Patients with T1D for at least 2 years, aged between 2.5 and 18 years, with at least one clinic visit between June 2010 and June 2021, were included in the study. Four groups were composed according to treatment modality as follows: multiple daily injections (MDI) without continuous glucose monitoring (CGM); MDI with CGM; subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) without CGM; and CSII with CGM. Data of the participants were analyzed and compared for each treatment modality separately. Results. A total of 38,956 children and adolescents were included in the study. Of the study sample, 48.6% were female, the median (range) age was 15.2 (11.9–17.2) years, and the median diabetes duration was 6.0 (3.8–9.0) years. The distribution of treatment modality was as follows: MDI without CGM, 32.9%; MDI with CGM, 18.0%; CSII without CGM, 11.7%; and CSII with CGM, 37.3%. In unadjusted data, regardless of treatment modality, all the analyses revealed a significant association between basal dose to total daily insulin dose (BD/TDD) with male gender, younger age group, and lower HbA1c, which were all related to a decreased ratio of BD/TDD (all \n \n p\n <\n 0.05\n \n ). There was no association between BD/TDD and different diabetes technologies after the age, gender, and diabetes duration were adjusted. Conclusions. Herein, we showed that there was an association between lower proportions of basal to total insulin and lower hemoglobin A1c in a large cross-sectional cohort of children who had T1D. There was also an association between lower BD/TDD and younger age. There was no significant difference between BD/TDD ratios under different diabetes technologies (CGM and/or CSII).","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8837506","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims. The optimal basal and bolus insulin distribution in type 1 diabetes (T1D) is still controversial. Herein, we aimed to determine the variability of basal to total daily insulin dose according to treatment modality and diabetes technologies from the Better Control in Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes: Working to Create Centers of Reference (SWEET) registry. Methods. The study cohort was generated by using the SWEET database. Patients with T1D for at least 2 years, aged between 2.5 and 18 years, with at least one clinic visit between June 2010 and June 2021, were included in the study. Four groups were composed according to treatment modality as follows: multiple daily injections (MDI) without continuous glucose monitoring (CGM); MDI with CGM; subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) without CGM; and CSII with CGM. Data of the participants were analyzed and compared for each treatment modality separately. Results. A total of 38,956 children and adolescents were included in the study. Of the study sample, 48.6% were female, the median (range) age was 15.2 (11.9–17.2) years, and the median diabetes duration was 6.0 (3.8–9.0) years. The distribution of treatment modality was as follows: MDI without CGM, 32.9%; MDI with CGM, 18.0%; CSII without CGM, 11.7%; and CSII with CGM, 37.3%. In unadjusted data, regardless of treatment modality, all the analyses revealed a significant association between basal dose to total daily insulin dose (BD/TDD) with male gender, younger age group, and lower HbA1c, which were all related to a decreased ratio of BD/TDD (all p < 0.05 ). There was no association between BD/TDD and different diabetes technologies after the age, gender, and diabetes duration were adjusted. Conclusions. Herein, we showed that there was an association between lower proportions of basal to total insulin and lower hemoglobin A1c in a large cross-sectional cohort of children who had T1D. There was also an association between lower BD/TDD and younger age. There was no significant difference between BD/TDD ratios under different diabetes technologies (CGM and/or CSII).
根据治疗方式的基础和剂量胰岛素分布:来自SWEET糖尿病登记处的数据
背景和目的。1型糖尿病(T1D)的最佳基础和推注胰岛素分布仍然存在争议。在此,我们旨在根据《儿童和青少年糖尿病的更好控制:努力创建参考中心》(SWEET)注册表中的治疗模式和糖尿病技术,确定基础日胰岛素剂量与总日胰岛素剂量的可变性。方法。研究队列是通过使用SWEET数据库生成的。T1D患者年龄在2.5至18岁之间,至少2年,在2010年6月至2021年6月期间至少有一次就诊,被纳入研究。根据治疗方式分为四组:每日多次注射(MDI),不进行连续血糖监测(CGM);MDI与CGM;不含CGM的皮下胰岛素输注(CSII);以及具有CGM的CSII。对参与者的数据进行分析,并分别对每种治疗方式进行比较。后果共有38956名儿童和青少年参与了这项研究。在研究样本中,48.6%为女性,中位(范围)年龄为15.2(11.9–17.2)岁,中位糖尿病持续时间为6.0(3.8–9.0)年。治疗方式分布如下:MDI无CGM,占32.9%;MDI与CGM,18.0%;无CGM的CSII为11.7%;在未经调整的数据中,无论治疗方式如何,所有分析都显示,基础剂量与每日总胰岛素剂量(BD/TDD)与男性、年轻组和HbA1c较低之间存在显著关联,这些都与BD/TDD比率下降有关(均p<0.05)。在调整年龄、性别和糖尿病持续时间后,BD/TDD与不同的糖尿病技术之间没有关联。结论。在此,我们发现,在患有T1D的儿童的大截面队列中,基础胰岛素与总胰岛素的比例较低与血红蛋白A1c较低之间存在关联。BD/TDD较低与年龄较小之间也存在关联。在不同的糖尿病技术(CGM和/或CSII)下,BD/TDD比率没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信