Deep uncertainty in humanitarian logistics operations: decision-making challenges in responding to large-scale natural disasters

IF 0.1 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Mohammad Tafiqur Rahman, Tim A. Majchrzak, T. Comes
{"title":"Deep uncertainty in humanitarian logistics operations: decision-making challenges in responding to large-scale natural disasters","authors":"Mohammad Tafiqur Rahman, Tim A. Majchrzak, T. Comes","doi":"10.1504/ijem.2019.10023857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Humanitarian logistics operations perform challenging tasks while responding to large-scale natural disasters. Decision makers at different stages of humanitarian operations exploit numerous problem-specific decision-making models or tools. When synchronising the outputs (decisions) from models into a unified solution, the situation becomes critical because of the lack of consensus on objectives and the availability of model alternatives with uncertainty in the models' key parameters and evaluation of the models' alternative outcomes. Thus, the operational environment becomes complex to respond urgently to humanitarian needs and makes the situation deeply uncertain. In this paper, we inspect humanitarian logistics problems and available deep uncertainty approaches to identify the adapting needs in the latter to be applicable to the former. Our research findings indicate that deep uncertainty approaches should incorporate the concept of short-term planning by considering time constraints, bounded process iteration, data transformation technique, handling process failure, and ways of identifying model assumptions.","PeriodicalId":44960,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijem.2019.10023857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Humanitarian logistics operations perform challenging tasks while responding to large-scale natural disasters. Decision makers at different stages of humanitarian operations exploit numerous problem-specific decision-making models or tools. When synchronising the outputs (decisions) from models into a unified solution, the situation becomes critical because of the lack of consensus on objectives and the availability of model alternatives with uncertainty in the models' key parameters and evaluation of the models' alternative outcomes. Thus, the operational environment becomes complex to respond urgently to humanitarian needs and makes the situation deeply uncertain. In this paper, we inspect humanitarian logistics problems and available deep uncertainty approaches to identify the adapting needs in the latter to be applicable to the former. Our research findings indicate that deep uncertainty approaches should incorporate the concept of short-term planning by considering time constraints, bounded process iteration, data transformation technique, handling process failure, and ways of identifying model assumptions.
人道主义后勤行动的深刻不确定性:应对大规模自然灾害的决策挑战
人道主义后勤行动在应对大规模自然灾害的同时执行具有挑战性的任务。人道主义行动不同阶段的决策者利用许多针对具体问题的决策模型或工具。当将模型的输出(决策)同步到统一的解决方案中时,由于对目标和模型替代方案的可用性缺乏共识,模型的关键参数和模型替代结果的评估存在不确定性,情况变得至关重要。因此,紧急应对人道主义需求的行动环境变得复杂,使局势极不确定。在本文中,我们考察了人道主义后勤问题和现有的深度不确定性方法,以确定后者的适应需求,使其适用于前者。我们的研究结果表明,深度不确定性方法应通过考虑时间约束、有界过程迭代、数据转换技术、处理过程故障和识别模型假设的方法,纳入短期规划的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: The IJEM is a refereed international journal published to address contingencies and emergencies as well as crisis and disaster management. Coverage includes the issues associated with: storms and flooding; nuclear power accidents; ferry, air and rail accidents; computer viruses; earthquakes etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信