Evolution of the Design Regulatory Framework in Ukraine and the EU Member States

Alona Letiaha
{"title":"Evolution of the Design Regulatory Framework in Ukraine and the EU Member States","authors":"Alona Letiaha","doi":"10.31866/2617-7951.6.1.2023.279087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the evolution of the design regulatory framework in Ukraine and the EU countries. The purpose is to identify the features of the evolution of the design legal framework in Ukraine and the EU. The research methodology consists in applying a number of approaches: analytical for comprehending the literature on the topic of the article; interdisciplinary for a comprehensive study of factual material and obtaining new knowledge; systematic with the use of a whole range of methods (biographical, semiotic, cultural, hermeneutical, historical, theoretical generalization) for a comprehensive understanding of the stated purpose of the study. Scientific novelty. For the first time, the European experience of developing the regulatory framework of design in comparison with the Ukrainian one is systematically studied. The results of the article can be used in the preparation of didactic materials for teaching courses on the regulatory framework of design. Сonclusions. Ukraine’s legislative framework currently does not sufficiently address the humanitarian factor, including its design and ergonomic factors, which does not contribute to the optimization of the state’s social sphere. In view of this, it is advisable to optimize the legislative framework in line with the best European practices to ensure the effective development of design and ergonomics in our country. The fundamental rationale for the EU design legal environment is that the protection of design legal property should ultimately lead to the economic well-being of countries in the EU region. The design harmonization program has always been part of the EU’s larger program for a harmonized legal environment and the completion of the internal market, especially with regard to intellectual property rights. The harmonization by means of the Design Directive and the Design Regulation in the EU is necessary in view of the significant differences in the protection of intellectual property for design objects in the various member states of the European Union.","PeriodicalId":33447,"journal":{"name":"Demiurg ideyi tekhnologiyi perspektivi dizainu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Demiurg ideyi tekhnologiyi perspektivi dizainu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31866/2617-7951.6.1.2023.279087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyzes the evolution of the design regulatory framework in Ukraine and the EU countries. The purpose is to identify the features of the evolution of the design legal framework in Ukraine and the EU. The research methodology consists in applying a number of approaches: analytical for comprehending the literature on the topic of the article; interdisciplinary for a comprehensive study of factual material and obtaining new knowledge; systematic with the use of a whole range of methods (biographical, semiotic, cultural, hermeneutical, historical, theoretical generalization) for a comprehensive understanding of the stated purpose of the study. Scientific novelty. For the first time, the European experience of developing the regulatory framework of design in comparison with the Ukrainian one is systematically studied. The results of the article can be used in the preparation of didactic materials for teaching courses on the regulatory framework of design. Сonclusions. Ukraine’s legislative framework currently does not sufficiently address the humanitarian factor, including its design and ergonomic factors, which does not contribute to the optimization of the state’s social sphere. In view of this, it is advisable to optimize the legislative framework in line with the best European practices to ensure the effective development of design and ergonomics in our country. The fundamental rationale for the EU design legal environment is that the protection of design legal property should ultimately lead to the economic well-being of countries in the EU region. The design harmonization program has always been part of the EU’s larger program for a harmonized legal environment and the completion of the internal market, especially with regard to intellectual property rights. The harmonization by means of the Design Directive and the Design Regulation in the EU is necessary in view of the significant differences in the protection of intellectual property for design objects in the various member states of the European Union.
乌克兰和欧盟成员国设计监管框架的演变
本文分析了乌克兰和欧盟国家设计监管框架的演变。目的是确定乌克兰和欧盟设计法律框架演变的特点。研究方法包括应用一些方法:分析理解关于文章主题的文献;跨学科的综合研究事实材料和获得新知识;系统地使用一系列方法(传记、符号学、文化、解释学、历史、理论概括)来全面理解研究的既定目的。科学的新奇。本文第一次系统地研究了欧洲在制定设计监管框架方面的经验,并与乌克兰进行了比较。本文的研究结果可用于设计规制框架课程的教学材料的编写。Сonclusions。乌克兰的立法框架目前没有充分解决人道主义因素,包括其设计和人体工程学因素,这无助于优化国家的社会领域。鉴于此,为了保证设计与人体工程学在我国的有效发展,建议根据欧洲的最佳实践来优化立法框架。欧盟外观设计法律环境的基本原理是,对外观设计合法财产的保护最终应导致欧盟地区各国的经济福祉。外观设计协调计划一直是欧盟更大计划的一部分,旨在协调法律环境和完善内部市场,特别是在知识产权方面。鉴于欧盟各成员国在设计客体的知识产权保护方面存在显著差异,通过欧盟设计指令和设计条例的协调是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书