Safety benefit of cooperative control for heterogeneous traffic on-ramp merging

IF 2.7 4区 工程技术 Q2 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Xiao Jing, Xinghua Pei, Song Yan, Chunyang Han, Selpi, E. Andreotti, Jishiyu Ding
{"title":"Safety benefit of cooperative control for heterogeneous traffic on-ramp merging","authors":"Xiao Jing, Xinghua Pei, Song Yan, Chunyang Han, Selpi, E. Andreotti, Jishiyu Ding","doi":"10.1093/tse/tdac031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The safety of heterogeneous traffic is a vital topic in the oncoming era of autonomous vehicles (AVs). The cooperative vehicle infras- tructure system (CVIS) is considered to improve heterogeneous traffic safety by connecting and controlling AVs cooperatively, and the connected AVs are so-called connected and automated vehicles (CAVs). However, the safety impact of cooperative control strategy on the heterogeneous traffic with CAVs and human-driving vehicles (HVs) has not been well investigated. In this paper, based on the traffic simulator SUMO, we designed a typical highway scenario of on-ramp merging and adopted a cooperative control method for CAVs. We then compared the safety performance for two different heterogeneous traffic systems, i.e. AV and HV, CAV and HV, respectively, to illustrate the safety benefits of the cooperative control strategy. We found that the safety performance of the CAV and HV traffic system does not always outperform that of AV and HV. With random departSpeed and higher arrival rate, the proposed cooperative control method would decrease the conflicts significantly whereas the penetration rate is over 80%. We further investigated the conflicts in terms of the leading and following vehicle types, and found that the risk of a AV/CAV followed by a HV is twice that of a HV followed by another HV. We also considered the safety effect of communication failure, and found that there is no significant impact until the packet loss probability is greater than 30%, while communication delay’s impact on safety can be ignored according to our experiments.","PeriodicalId":52804,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Safety and Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Safety and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tse/tdac031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The safety of heterogeneous traffic is a vital topic in the oncoming era of autonomous vehicles (AVs). The cooperative vehicle infras- tructure system (CVIS) is considered to improve heterogeneous traffic safety by connecting and controlling AVs cooperatively, and the connected AVs are so-called connected and automated vehicles (CAVs). However, the safety impact of cooperative control strategy on the heterogeneous traffic with CAVs and human-driving vehicles (HVs) has not been well investigated. In this paper, based on the traffic simulator SUMO, we designed a typical highway scenario of on-ramp merging and adopted a cooperative control method for CAVs. We then compared the safety performance for two different heterogeneous traffic systems, i.e. AV and HV, CAV and HV, respectively, to illustrate the safety benefits of the cooperative control strategy. We found that the safety performance of the CAV and HV traffic system does not always outperform that of AV and HV. With random departSpeed and higher arrival rate, the proposed cooperative control method would decrease the conflicts significantly whereas the penetration rate is over 80%. We further investigated the conflicts in terms of the leading and following vehicle types, and found that the risk of a AV/CAV followed by a HV is twice that of a HV followed by another HV. We also considered the safety effect of communication failure, and found that there is no significant impact until the packet loss probability is greater than 30%, while communication delay’s impact on safety can be ignored according to our experiments.
匝道合流异质交通协同控制的安全效益
在即将到来的自动驾驶汽车时代,异构交通的安全性是一个至关重要的话题。协同车辆基础设施系统(cooperative vehicle infrastructure system, CVIS)被认为是通过对自动驾驶汽车的协同连接和控制来提高异构交通安全,被连接的自动驾驶汽车被称为互联和自动驾驶汽车(cav)。然而,协同控制策略对无人驾驶汽车和人类驾驶汽车(HVs)异构交通的安全影响尚未得到很好的研究。本文基于交通模拟器SUMO,设计了典型的公路匝道入路合流场景,并对自动驾驶汽车采用协同控制方法。然后,我们比较了两种不同的异构交通系统(即AV和HV, CAV和HV)的安全性能,以说明协同控制策略的安全效益。我们发现CAV和HV交通系统的安全性能并不总是优于AV和HV交通系统。采用随机出港速度和较高到达率的协同控制方法,可显著减少冲突,且渗透率在80%以上。我们进一步调查了前车和后车的冲突,发现一辆AV/CAV后面跟着一辆HV的风险是一辆HV后面跟着另一辆HV的风险的两倍。我们还考虑了通信故障对安全的影响,发现在丢包概率大于30%之前没有明显的影响,而根据我们的实验可以忽略通信延迟对安全的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation Safety and Environment
Transportation Safety and Environment TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
32
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信