Le Cogito newmanien: La preuve du théisme by Grégory Solari (review)

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
Oswaldo Gallo-Serratos
{"title":"Le Cogito newmanien: La preuve du théisme by Grégory Solari (review)","authors":"Oswaldo Gallo-Serratos","doi":"10.1353/nsj.2022.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knox’s influence on the Tractarians is somewhat opaque, but the sense in which he was a forerunner of this catholicizing branch of Anglicanism was summed up well by Newman toward the end of his life (1887): “we were happy to have [Knox] as far as he went, and I think we used him” (253). Throughout the book, the ecumenical implications of “Mr. Knox’s system” (107, 259) become apparent, and this feature of Knox’s thought is applauded by McCready in the conclusion. Especially after Catholicism’s conciliar and postconciliar experiences, when reform became so tightly linked to ressourcement, Knox’s desire to be “a Christian of the first six centuries” (129, 262), rooted in the church fathers—especially when combined with his friendships across denominational lines, irenic approach to disagreement, and support of political relief for Catholics in the form of the Emancipation finally promulgated in 1829 (though Knox still emphatically supported an Established Church) show Knox as a scion not only of irenicism but of ecumenism. This excellently researched and well-written book is an important contribution to our knowledge of an underappreciated thinker at the crossroads of a number of important ecclesial and political events. The Knox that emerges from McCready’s study is a generous, erudite man with something to say to Calvinists and Evangelicals, Catholics and Tractarians. Some theological and historical background is assumed, but advanced undergraduates and up will be able to benefit from this excellent book.","PeriodicalId":41065,"journal":{"name":"Newman Studies Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Newman Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nsj.2022.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Knox’s influence on the Tractarians is somewhat opaque, but the sense in which he was a forerunner of this catholicizing branch of Anglicanism was summed up well by Newman toward the end of his life (1887): “we were happy to have [Knox] as far as he went, and I think we used him” (253). Throughout the book, the ecumenical implications of “Mr. Knox’s system” (107, 259) become apparent, and this feature of Knox’s thought is applauded by McCready in the conclusion. Especially after Catholicism’s conciliar and postconciliar experiences, when reform became so tightly linked to ressourcement, Knox’s desire to be “a Christian of the first six centuries” (129, 262), rooted in the church fathers—especially when combined with his friendships across denominational lines, irenic approach to disagreement, and support of political relief for Catholics in the form of the Emancipation finally promulgated in 1829 (though Knox still emphatically supported an Established Church) show Knox as a scion not only of irenicism but of ecumenism. This excellently researched and well-written book is an important contribution to our knowledge of an underappreciated thinker at the crossroads of a number of important ecclesial and political events. The Knox that emerges from McCready’s study is a generous, erudite man with something to say to Calvinists and Evangelicals, Catholics and Tractarians. Some theological and historical background is assumed, but advanced undergraduates and up will be able to benefit from this excellent book.
Newmanian Cogito:格雷戈里·索拉里的有神论证明(评论)
诺克斯对特拉塔里亚人的影响有些不透明,但纽曼在他生命的尽头(1887年)很好地总结了他是圣公会天主教分支的先驱的感觉:“我们很高兴(诺克斯)能走到他所走的那一步,我想我们利用了他”(253)。在整本书中,“诺克斯先生的制度”(107259)的普世含义变得显而易见,诺克斯思想的这一特点在结论中受到了麦克雷迪的赞扬。尤其是在天主教的简洁和后天主教经历之后,当改革与资源重组紧密联系在一起时,诺克斯想成为“前六个世纪的基督徒”(129262)的愿望植根于教会的父亲——尤其是当与他跨教派的友谊、对分歧的理性态度相结合时,1829年最终颁布的《解放》(尽管诺克斯仍然大力支持建立教会),以及对天主教徒政治救济的支持,表明诺克斯不仅是爱尔兰主义的后裔,也是普世主义的后裔。这本研究出色、文笔优美的书对我们了解一位处于许多重要教会和政治事件十字路口的被低估的思想家做出了重要贡献。麦克雷迪研究中出现的诺克斯是一个慷慨、博学的人,他对加尔文主义者、福音派、天主教徒和拖拉机手都有话要说。假设有一些神学和历史背景,但高级本科生及以上将能够从这本优秀的书中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信