Effect of psyllium husk addition on the instrumental texture and consumer acceptability of high-fiber wheat pan bread and buns

IF 3.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Mohammad M. Abdullah , Ahmed D.H. Aldughpassi , Jiwan S. Sidhu , Muhammad Y. Al-Foudari , Amani R.A. Al-Othman
{"title":"Effect of psyllium husk addition on the instrumental texture and consumer acceptability of high-fiber wheat pan bread and buns","authors":"Mohammad M. Abdullah ,&nbsp;Ahmed D.H. Aldughpassi ,&nbsp;Jiwan S. Sidhu ,&nbsp;Muhammad Y. Al-Foudari ,&nbsp;Amani R.A. Al-Othman","doi":"10.1016/j.aoas.2021.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The consumption of recommended amount of dietary fiber is a challenge not only for most consumers but also for the food scientists to design fiber-enriched foods with acceptable eating quality, texture, color and flavor. The addition of psyllium husk (PS) significantly made the bread texture softer with increasing levels, producing the lowest compression force value (2.48 ± 0.37 N) at a 5% level. Addition of coarse wheat bran (at 10 and 20% levels) to white wheat flour (WWF) produced a significantly softer bread texture (4.65 ± 0.61 to 5.27 ± 0.32 N) compared with the harder texture with the fine wheat bran addition (5.04 ± 0.33 to 6.82 ± 0.57 N) for the control samples, respectively. When psyllium at 5% level was added to either the WWF or wholegrain wheat flour (WGF), it produced a significantly softer bread texture. Interestingly, the incorporation of diacetyl tartaric acid esters of mono- and diglyceride (DATEM) emulsifier (0.5%) in the WWF or WGF bread samples containing 5% psyllium did not significantly improve the textural properties of bread samples. When WWF + 5%PS (4.03 ± 0.12 N) buns were compared with WGF + 5%PS, the WGF +5%PS buns (7.37 ± 0.16 N) had a significantly harder texture. The results of compression force (N) and higher consumer acceptability values of these products clearly brought out the superior textural properties of wheat pan bread and buns made by this newer approach, than the common approach of using only the wholegrain wheat flour. Future studies on the effect of various wheat bran treatments, such as steaming or extrusion on the textural properties of pan bread and buns are recommended.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54198,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Agricultural Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aoas.2021.05.002","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Agricultural Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0570178321000178","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

The consumption of recommended amount of dietary fiber is a challenge not only for most consumers but also for the food scientists to design fiber-enriched foods with acceptable eating quality, texture, color and flavor. The addition of psyllium husk (PS) significantly made the bread texture softer with increasing levels, producing the lowest compression force value (2.48 ± 0.37 N) at a 5% level. Addition of coarse wheat bran (at 10 and 20% levels) to white wheat flour (WWF) produced a significantly softer bread texture (4.65 ± 0.61 to 5.27 ± 0.32 N) compared with the harder texture with the fine wheat bran addition (5.04 ± 0.33 to 6.82 ± 0.57 N) for the control samples, respectively. When psyllium at 5% level was added to either the WWF or wholegrain wheat flour (WGF), it produced a significantly softer bread texture. Interestingly, the incorporation of diacetyl tartaric acid esters of mono- and diglyceride (DATEM) emulsifier (0.5%) in the WWF or WGF bread samples containing 5% psyllium did not significantly improve the textural properties of bread samples. When WWF + 5%PS (4.03 ± 0.12 N) buns were compared with WGF + 5%PS, the WGF +5%PS buns (7.37 ± 0.16 N) had a significantly harder texture. The results of compression force (N) and higher consumer acceptability values of these products clearly brought out the superior textural properties of wheat pan bread and buns made by this newer approach, than the common approach of using only the wholegrain wheat flour. Future studies on the effect of various wheat bran treatments, such as steaming or extrusion on the textural properties of pan bread and buns are recommended.

车前草皮添加对高纤维小麦面饼和馒头的质感和消费者接受度的影响
膳食纤维的推荐摄入量不仅对大多数消费者来说是一个挑战,而且对食品科学家来说,设计出具有可接受的食用质量、质地、颜色和风味的富含纤维的食品也是一个挑战。车前草皮(PS)的添加量越高,面包的质地越柔软,在添加量为5%时产生的压缩力值最低(2.48±0.37 N)。在白小麦粉(WWF)中添加10%和20%的粗麦麸,可获得较软的面包质地(4.65±0.61 ~ 5.27±0.32 N),而在对照样品中添加细麦麸(5.04±0.33 ~ 6.82±0.57 N)。在全谷面粉中添加5%车前草后,面包的质地明显变软。有趣的是,添加0.5%的单甘油三酯和双甘油三酯(DATEM)乳化剂对含有5%车前草的WGF或WWF面包样品的质地性能没有显著改善。与WGF +5%PS(4.03±0.12 N)相比,WGF +5%PS(7.37±0.16 N)的馒头质地更硬。这些产品的压缩力(N)和较高的消费者接受值的结果清楚地表明,采用这种新方法制作的小麦平底面包和馒头的质地性能优于仅使用全麦面粉的普通方法。建议进一步研究各种麦麸处理方法,如蒸煮或挤压对面包和馒头质地特性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Agricultural Science
Annals of Agricultural Science AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Agricultural Sciences (AOAS) is the official journal of Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University. AOAS is an open access peer-reviewed journal publishing original research articles and review articles on experimental and modelling research at laboratory, field, farm, landscape, and industrial levels. AOAS aims to maximize the quality of the agricultural sector across the globe with emphasis on the Arabian countries by focusing on publishing the high-quality applicable researches, in addition to the new methods and frontiers leading to maximizing the quality and quantity of both plant and animal yield and final products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信