Legal Development of the Validity of Electronic Mortgage Certificates in the Land Registration System in Indonesia

Dhaniswara K. Harjono
{"title":"Legal Development of the Validity of Electronic Mortgage Certificates in the Land Registration System in Indonesia","authors":"Dhaniswara K. Harjono","doi":"10.20961/yustisia.v11i2.61111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electronic encumbrance Right is one of the breakthroughs made by the Minister of Agrarian Affairs to improve services in the land sector and support the Government in realizing a digital bureaucracy in Indonesia. This paper aims to deeply examine the validity and execution of such electronic Encumbrance Right Certificates.The main findings show that the electronic Encumbrance Right Certificate cannot be separated from the provisions of the Electronic Information and Transactions law, which lays out the conditions that must be met for the validity of electronic certificates and their status as evidence in court. The problem of authentication differs from the acknowledgement of electronic data. If the data or electronic documents are accepted or legally recognized, the authentication process for the data will automatically follow. The authentication process is a matter of technology while acknowledging electronic documents involves formal recognition in laws and regulations. Electronic evidence consisting of Electronic Information or Electronic Documents or the printouts produced by the Electronic System is legal evidence. On the other hand, if the Electronic Information is not generated through the Electronic System, the evidence cannot automatically be assessed as valid. Such electronic information can be used as electronic evidence if the authenticity, accuracy, and integrity have been verified through an information technology forensic audit","PeriodicalId":33244,"journal":{"name":"Yustisia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yustisia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v11i2.61111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electronic encumbrance Right is one of the breakthroughs made by the Minister of Agrarian Affairs to improve services in the land sector and support the Government in realizing a digital bureaucracy in Indonesia. This paper aims to deeply examine the validity and execution of such electronic Encumbrance Right Certificates.The main findings show that the electronic Encumbrance Right Certificate cannot be separated from the provisions of the Electronic Information and Transactions law, which lays out the conditions that must be met for the validity of electronic certificates and their status as evidence in court. The problem of authentication differs from the acknowledgement of electronic data. If the data or electronic documents are accepted or legally recognized, the authentication process for the data will automatically follow. The authentication process is a matter of technology while acknowledging electronic documents involves formal recognition in laws and regulations. Electronic evidence consisting of Electronic Information or Electronic Documents or the printouts produced by the Electronic System is legal evidence. On the other hand, if the Electronic Information is not generated through the Electronic System, the evidence cannot automatically be assessed as valid. Such electronic information can be used as electronic evidence if the authenticity, accuracy, and integrity have been verified through an information technology forensic audit
印度尼西亚土地登记系统中电子抵押证书有效性的法律发展
电子产权是土地事务部长在改善土地部门服务和支持政府在印度尼西亚实现数字官僚机构方面取得的突破之一。本文旨在深入研究此类电子产权证书的有效性和执行情况。主要研究结果表明,电子产权证书离不开《电子信息与交易法》的规定,其中规定了电子证书的有效性及其在法庭上作为证据的地位必须满足的条件。认证问题不同于对电子数据的确认。如果数据或电子文档被接受或得到法律认可,数据的验证过程将自动进行。认证过程是一个技术问题,而承认电子文件涉及法律法规中的正式承认。由电子信息或电子文件或电子系统产生的打印件组成的电子证据是法律证据。另一方面,如果电子信息不是通过电子系统生成的,则不能自动评估证据是否有效。如果通过信息技术取证审计验证了此类电子信息的真实性、准确性和完整性,则可以将其用作电子证据
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信