Det farlige spørgsmål: Identitetsudfordringer for nye studerende ved en ung professionsuddannelse

Mads Kryger Frandsen, Trine Kokholm, Kaare Aagaard
{"title":"Det farlige spørgsmål: Identitetsudfordringer for nye studerende ved en ung professionsuddannelse","authors":"Mads Kryger Frandsen, Trine Kokholm, Kaare Aagaard","doi":"10.7146/tfp.v19i36.139970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores understandings of professional identity among newly started students at the Public Administration Bachelor-education at a Danish University College and analyzes tensions linked to these. Based on data from focus group interviews and ‘study start tests’ the article focuses on perceived advantages and disadvantages of initiating an education with short history, low public visibility, but also great flexibility in relation to potential career paths. Based on Kåre Heggen's theoretical work, the analysis highlights the distinction between an internal and an external view of the education as crucial for understanding the students’ statements. A key observation is that the students generally consider flexibility in relation to future career paths to be a strength, but at the same time miss the external recognition associated with more established professions. The article thereby shows how many new students, on the one hand, request the legitimacy linked to clear professional images, but on the other hand, highlight their appreciation of the flexibility and open-ended nature of this particular education. It thus points to a central, but also difficult, challenge with relevance across a wide range of University College educations: How to balance a strong collective identity with the needs of individualization and flexibility?","PeriodicalId":32373,"journal":{"name":"Tidsskrift for Professionsstudier","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidsskrift for Professionsstudier","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/tfp.v19i36.139970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores understandings of professional identity among newly started students at the Public Administration Bachelor-education at a Danish University College and analyzes tensions linked to these. Based on data from focus group interviews and ‘study start tests’ the article focuses on perceived advantages and disadvantages of initiating an education with short history, low public visibility, but also great flexibility in relation to potential career paths. Based on Kåre Heggen's theoretical work, the analysis highlights the distinction between an internal and an external view of the education as crucial for understanding the students’ statements. A key observation is that the students generally consider flexibility in relation to future career paths to be a strength, but at the same time miss the external recognition associated with more established professions. The article thereby shows how many new students, on the one hand, request the legitimacy linked to clear professional images, but on the other hand, highlight their appreciation of the flexibility and open-ended nature of this particular education. It thus points to a central, but also difficult, challenge with relevance across a wide range of University College educations: How to balance a strong collective identity with the needs of individualization and flexibility?
危险的问题:青年专业教育中新生的身份挑战
本文探讨了丹麦大学学院公共管理学士教育新生对职业身份的理解,并分析了与之相关的紧张关系。基于焦点小组访谈和“学习开始测试”的数据,文章重点关注了开办历史较短、公众知名度较低、但在潜在职业道路方面具有很大灵活性的教育的优势和劣势。基于Kåre Heggen的理论工作,该分析强调了教育的内部和外部观点之间的区别,这对理解学生的陈述至关重要。一个关键的观察结果是,学生们通常认为与未来职业道路相关的灵活性是一种优势,但同时又错过了与更成熟的职业相关的外部认可。因此,这篇文章展示了有多少新生一方面要求获得与清晰的职业形象相关的合法性,但另一方面,强调了他们对这种特殊教育的灵活性和开放性的赞赏。因此,它指出了一个核心但也是困难的挑战,它与大学学院的广泛教育相关:如何在强大的集体认同与个性化和灵活性的需求之间取得平衡?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信