Education in a ‘neoliberalised’ online teaching and learning space: Towards an affirmative ethics

Q3 Social Sciences
L. le Grange, S. Maistry, S. Simmonds, A. Visser, L. Ramrathan
{"title":"Education in a ‘neoliberalised’ online teaching and learning space: Towards an affirmative ethics","authors":"L. le Grange, S. Maistry, S. Simmonds, A. Visser, L. Ramrathan","doi":"10.4102/the.v7i0.205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The sudden mass migration of teaching, learning and assessment to the digital terrain because of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the global proliferation of scholarship. This scholarship ranges from romantic notions of the opportunity to revivify curriculum and pedagogy in what was deemed an underutilised educational technology (online) resource space to scholarship contemptuous of this newfound romance. This has exposed the potential affordances of online teaching and its adjunctive exclusionary effects. Whilst the authors recognise the short-term benefits of adapting advanced technology for educational purposes, they provoke the question as to the obliterative potential of technology for the human (university academics in this instance) and the non-human/more-than-human. It is, however, without contention that the neoliberal university, driven by the economic viability and sustainability imperative, gives precedence to curriculum delivery and student support to secure degree completion targets even within academic timeframe (year) constraints. As such, it is likely to neglect the cogent matter of the affective as it relates to both academics, students and the non-human. In this conceptual article, Rosi Braidotti’s critical posthumanist perspective is drawn upon, offering both critical and affirmative propositions for moving forward in engagement with technologies in emerging educational online spaces. Firstly, critical perspectives are offered on some challenges of the neoliberal contouring and new regimes of accountability and surveillance that appear to have become more efficacious in the digital space. Secondly, it is acknowledged that humans live in a technologically mediated world and need to navigate this world in productive ways. Braidotti’s philosophy of affirmative ethics helps us to invigorate affordances of educational technology that are hopeful. This article’s contribution lies in alternative imaginings of educational technology, so that technology can be used in ways that advance pedagogical lives and social relations. © 2022. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS. This work.","PeriodicalId":32132,"journal":{"name":"Transformation in Higher Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transformation in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/the.v7i0.205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The sudden mass migration of teaching, learning and assessment to the digital terrain because of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the global proliferation of scholarship. This scholarship ranges from romantic notions of the opportunity to revivify curriculum and pedagogy in what was deemed an underutilised educational technology (online) resource space to scholarship contemptuous of this newfound romance. This has exposed the potential affordances of online teaching and its adjunctive exclusionary effects. Whilst the authors recognise the short-term benefits of adapting advanced technology for educational purposes, they provoke the question as to the obliterative potential of technology for the human (university academics in this instance) and the non-human/more-than-human. It is, however, without contention that the neoliberal university, driven by the economic viability and sustainability imperative, gives precedence to curriculum delivery and student support to secure degree completion targets even within academic timeframe (year) constraints. As such, it is likely to neglect the cogent matter of the affective as it relates to both academics, students and the non-human. In this conceptual article, Rosi Braidotti’s critical posthumanist perspective is drawn upon, offering both critical and affirmative propositions for moving forward in engagement with technologies in emerging educational online spaces. Firstly, critical perspectives are offered on some challenges of the neoliberal contouring and new regimes of accountability and surveillance that appear to have become more efficacious in the digital space. Secondly, it is acknowledged that humans live in a technologically mediated world and need to navigate this world in productive ways. Braidotti’s philosophy of affirmative ethics helps us to invigorate affordances of educational technology that are hopeful. This article’s contribution lies in alternative imaginings of educational technology, so that technology can be used in ways that advance pedagogical lives and social relations. © 2022. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS. This work.
“新自由主义”在线教学空间中的教育:走向平权伦理
由于新冠肺炎大流行,教学、学习和评估突然大规模迁移到数字领域,导致奖学金在全球激增。这种奖学金包括在被认为未充分利用的教育技术(在线)资源空间中振兴课程和教育学的浪漫概念,以及对这种新浪漫的蔑视。这暴露了在线教学的潜在可供性及其附带的排斥效应。虽然作者认识到将先进技术用于教育目的的短期好处,但他们提出了一个问题,即技术对人类(在这种情况下是大学学者)和非人类/不仅仅是人类的毁灭性潜力。然而,毫无疑问,新自由主义大学在经济可行性和可持续性的必要性的驱动下,优先考虑课程提供和学生支持,以确保学位完成目标,即使在学年限制内也是如此。因此,它很可能忽略了情感这一令人信服的问题,因为它涉及到学术界、学生和非人类。在这篇概念性文章中,Rosi Braidotti的批判后人文主义观点得到了借鉴,为在新兴的教育在线空间中推进技术提供了批判和肯定的主张。首先,对新自由主义轮廓和新的问责和监督制度的一些挑战提出了批判性的观点,这些制度似乎在数字空间中变得更加有效。其次,人们承认,人类生活在一个以技术为媒介的世界中,需要以富有成效的方式驾驭这个世界。Braidotti的肯定伦理哲学帮助我们激发了充满希望的教育技术的可供性。本文的贡献在于对教育技术的另类想象,从而使技术可以用于促进教学生活和社会关系。©2022。作者。被许可方:AOSIS。这个工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transformation in Higher Education
Transformation in Higher Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信