A KAP Study on Dog Bite and Its Management in a Rural Community — Need for Increasing the Awareness

Amitava Dutta, R. Hiremath, Satyasheel Y Hasure
{"title":"A KAP Study on Dog Bite and Its Management in a Rural Community — Need for Increasing the Awareness","authors":"Amitava Dutta, R. Hiremath, Satyasheel Y Hasure","doi":"10.46347/jmsh.v8i2.21.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To access knowledge, attitude, and practices about dog bites and their management in the rural community of Maharashtra. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted in an identified rural community with a sample size of 279 using systematic random sampling data was collected using personal interview using pretested questionnaire and descriptive and inferential statistics was applied. Results: The mean age of the subjects was 42.8±7.5 years and the majority (68.8%) were male and 31.2% were female. 72.4% didn't have any pet dog and all (100.0%) have experienced a dog bite for themselves or anyone in the family in their lifetime. The majority (93.4%) have described rabies illness and 100% correctly know that the main animal of rabies in India is a dog and the correct mode of disease transmission. However, only 7.9% know the most common age group affected. The majority (59.1%) have heard about the anti-rabies vaccine. Awareness of anti-rabies vaccine varies in different groups based on their educational qualification and Pearson's chi-square value was statistically significant. Vaccination of pet dogs as a periodic activity to prevent rabies has been strongly disagreed by 22.2% of participants. 23.3% strongly agreed that stray dogs are a social nuisance. The majority 24.7% have disagreed with the implementation of the Animal Birth Control program. The relationship between the level of education and attitude towards native/traditional healers in preventing rabies after a dog bite was significant (p<0.05). It was also found that the following dog bite only 28.0% would like to wash the wound with soap and water following a dog bite. Conclusion: There exists a considerable gap in knowledge attitudes and practices about Dog bites and their management. Increasing the awareness, and changing the attitude and beliefs among the study population is the need of the hour, Accordingly Regular IEC activities to be planned at various centers Keywords: Knowledge, attitude, practices, Dog bite, Management","PeriodicalId":33653,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Sciences and Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Sciences and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46347/jmsh.v8i2.21.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To access knowledge, attitude, and practices about dog bites and their management in the rural community of Maharashtra. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted in an identified rural community with a sample size of 279 using systematic random sampling data was collected using personal interview using pretested questionnaire and descriptive and inferential statistics was applied. Results: The mean age of the subjects was 42.8±7.5 years and the majority (68.8%) were male and 31.2% were female. 72.4% didn't have any pet dog and all (100.0%) have experienced a dog bite for themselves or anyone in the family in their lifetime. The majority (93.4%) have described rabies illness and 100% correctly know that the main animal of rabies in India is a dog and the correct mode of disease transmission. However, only 7.9% know the most common age group affected. The majority (59.1%) have heard about the anti-rabies vaccine. Awareness of anti-rabies vaccine varies in different groups based on their educational qualification and Pearson's chi-square value was statistically significant. Vaccination of pet dogs as a periodic activity to prevent rabies has been strongly disagreed by 22.2% of participants. 23.3% strongly agreed that stray dogs are a social nuisance. The majority 24.7% have disagreed with the implementation of the Animal Birth Control program. The relationship between the level of education and attitude towards native/traditional healers in preventing rabies after a dog bite was significant (p<0.05). It was also found that the following dog bite only 28.0% would like to wash the wound with soap and water following a dog bite. Conclusion: There exists a considerable gap in knowledge attitudes and practices about Dog bites and their management. Increasing the awareness, and changing the attitude and beliefs among the study population is the need of the hour, Accordingly Regular IEC activities to be planned at various centers Keywords: Knowledge, attitude, practices, Dog bite, Management
农村社区犬咬伤及其管理的KAP研究——需要提高认识
目的:了解马哈拉施特拉邦农村社区关于狗咬伤及其管理的知识、态度和做法。方法:在一个已确定的农村社区进行了一项横断面研究,样本量为279,使用系统随机抽样数据,使用预测试问卷进行个人访谈,并应用描述性和推断统计学。结果:受试者的平均年龄为42.8±7.5岁,大多数(68.8%)为男性,31.2%为女性。72.4%的人没有宠物狗,所有人(100.0%)一生中都经历过自己或家里任何人被狗咬伤的经历。大多数人(93.4%)描述过狂犬病,100%正确地知道印度狂犬病的主要动物是狗和正确的疾病传播方式。然而,只有7.9%的人知道最常见的受影响年龄组。大多数人(59.1%)听说过抗狂犬病疫苗。不同人群对狂犬病疫苗的认识因学历而异,Pearson卡方值具有统计学意义。22.2%的参与者强烈反对将宠物狗接种疫苗作为预防狂犬病的定期活动。23.3%的人强烈认为流浪狗是一种社会公害。大多数24.7%的人不同意动物节育计划的实施。在预防狗咬伤后狂犬病方面,教育水平和对当地/传统治疗师的态度之间存在显著关系(p<0.05)。此外,只有28.0%的狗咬伤患者愿意在狗咬伤后用肥皂和水清洗伤口。结论:对狗咬伤及其管理的认识、态度和实践存在较大差距。提高研究人群的意识,改变态度和信念是当前的需要,因此,各中心应计划定期的IEC活动关键词:知识、态度、实践、狗咬、管理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书