Examining What Works for High Risk Youth Involved in the Juvenile Justice System: Comparing the Effect of the Community Connections (CC) Program to Intensive Supervision Probation (ISP) Over A Nine-Year Time Period

Erin M. Espinosa, D. Sass, Johanna Creswell Báez, Cassandra Harper
{"title":"Examining What Works for High Risk Youth Involved in the Juvenile Justice System: Comparing the Effect of the Community Connections (CC) Program to Intensive Supervision Probation (ISP) Over A Nine-Year Time Period","authors":"Erin M. Espinosa, D. Sass, Johanna Creswell Báez, Cassandra Harper","doi":"10.52935/20.51916.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using administrative data collected by an urban juvenile probation department between January 2007 and August 2016, this study compared the impact of the Community Connections (CC) program to a matched sample of youth who received intensive supervision probation (ISP) on six time-to-event variables (i.e., time to second program, detention, out-of-home placement, another offense, violation of court order, and days in program). The study included youth who were assigned to court-ordered post-adjudication community supervision and who were deemed to have a high risk of re-offending by the department’s risk and needs assessment. CC and ISP youth were matched using propensity score matching that created a final sample of 381 youth in each program. When examining the program effect of CC vs. ISP on the time-to-event variables the findings were mixed. However, across both programs, the analysis revealed that youth who\nremained in the programs longer and youth with a successful program discharge generally\nexperienced better long-term outcomes than their peers.","PeriodicalId":73606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied juvenile justice services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied juvenile justice services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52935/20.51916.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using administrative data collected by an urban juvenile probation department between January 2007 and August 2016, this study compared the impact of the Community Connections (CC) program to a matched sample of youth who received intensive supervision probation (ISP) on six time-to-event variables (i.e., time to second program, detention, out-of-home placement, another offense, violation of court order, and days in program). The study included youth who were assigned to court-ordered post-adjudication community supervision and who were deemed to have a high risk of re-offending by the department’s risk and needs assessment. CC and ISP youth were matched using propensity score matching that created a final sample of 381 youth in each program. When examining the program effect of CC vs. ISP on the time-to-event variables the findings were mixed. However, across both programs, the analysis revealed that youth who remained in the programs longer and youth with a successful program discharge generally experienced better long-term outcomes than their peers.
检验什么对参与少年司法系统的高风险青少年有效:比较九年期间社区联系(CC)计划与强化监督缓刑(ISP)的效果
利用2007年1月至2016年8月期间城市未成年人缓刑监督管理部门收集的行政数据,本研究将社区联系(CC)计划与接受强化监督缓刑(ISP)的匹配样本在六个时间-事件变量(即第二个计划的时间、拘留、家庭外安置、另一次犯罪、违反法庭命令和计划天数)上的影响进行了比较。这项研究包括被指派接受法院命令的裁决后社区监督的年轻人,他们被司法部的风险和需求评估认为有很高的再次犯罪风险。CC和ISP青年使用倾向得分匹配进行匹配,在每个项目中创建了381名青年的最终样本。在研究CC与ISP对事件发生时间变量的程序影响时,发现喜忧参半。然而,在这两个项目中,分析显示,年轻人在项目中嫖娼的时间更长,项目成功出院的年轻人通常比同龄人经历了更好的长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信