Effectiveness of motor imagery on sports performance in football players: A randomised control trial.

Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-25 DOI:10.1142/S1013702524500021
Jaruwan Prasomsri, Bunthita Thueman, Pichamon Yuenyong, Chayanon Thongnoon, Naruepa Khophongphaibun, Suppakorn Ariyawatcharin
{"title":"Effectiveness of motor imagery on sports performance in football players: A randomised control trial.","authors":"Jaruwan Prasomsri, Bunthita Thueman, Pichamon Yuenyong, Chayanon Thongnoon, Naruepa Khophongphaibun, Suppakorn Ariyawatcharin","doi":"10.1142/S1013702524500021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nowadays, the development of training programs for speed, agility and reaction time responses in football players is increasing widely. Motor imagery is a new method that uses collateral with physical training. However, there is still a scarcity of evidence concerning the addition of motor imagery protocol to routine training programs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The main objective was to compare speed, agility and reaction time after motor imagery training in university athletes and amateur athletes who received and did not receive motor imagery training for 2 weeks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were divided into 4 subgroups as follows: university athlete group with motor imagery training and control group, amateur athlete group with motor imagery training and control group. This study collected the training effects of speed, agility and reaction time. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Mann-Whitney U test were selected to analyse the differences within and between groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The result presented positive changes in all variables after training sessions for 2 weeks in all groups. Speed at 20 m, agility, and reaction time were found to be significantly different after motor imagery training in both university athletes and amateur athletes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This finding demonstrated that the addition of the motor imagery training along with routine physical training promotes physical performance in athletes at all experience levels. In further studies, the retention effect after practice should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10988270/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S1013702524500021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nowadays, the development of training programs for speed, agility and reaction time responses in football players is increasing widely. Motor imagery is a new method that uses collateral with physical training. However, there is still a scarcity of evidence concerning the addition of motor imagery protocol to routine training programs.

Objective: The main objective was to compare speed, agility and reaction time after motor imagery training in university athletes and amateur athletes who received and did not receive motor imagery training for 2 weeks.

Methods: Participants were divided into 4 subgroups as follows: university athlete group with motor imagery training and control group, amateur athlete group with motor imagery training and control group. This study collected the training effects of speed, agility and reaction time. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Mann-Whitney U test were selected to analyse the differences within and between groups, respectively.

Results: The result presented positive changes in all variables after training sessions for 2 weeks in all groups. Speed at 20 m, agility, and reaction time were found to be significantly different after motor imagery training in both university athletes and amateur athletes.

Conclusion: This finding demonstrated that the addition of the motor imagery training along with routine physical training promotes physical performance in athletes at all experience levels. In further studies, the retention effect after practice should be considered.

分享
查看原文
运动意象对足球运动员运动表现的影响:一项随机对照试验
背景:如今,足球运动员速度、敏捷性和反应时间反应的训练项目正在广泛发展。运动想象是一种新的方法,它结合了体能训练。然而,关于在常规训练项目中添加运动图像协议的证据仍然很少。目的:比较接受和未接受运动表象训练2周的大学运动员和业余运动员在运动表象训练后的速度、敏捷性和反应时间。方法:将受试者分为4个亚组:大学运动表象训练对照组、业余运动表象训练控制组。本研究收集了速度、敏捷性和反应时间的训练效果。选择Wilcoxon符号秩检验和Mann-Whitney U检验分别分析组内和组间的差异。结果:所有组在训练2周后,所有变量都出现了积极变化。在大学运动员和业余运动员进行运动想象训练后,发现20米的速度、敏捷性和反应时间显著不同。结论:这一发现表明,在常规体育训练的基础上增加运动意象训练,可以提高运动员在各个经验水平上的身体表现。在进一步的研究中,应考虑实践后的保留效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信