Biological and chemical pruning wound protectants reduce infection of grapevine trunk disease pathogens

IF 1.2 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
R. Blundell, A. Eskalen
{"title":"Biological and chemical pruning wound protectants reduce infection of grapevine trunk disease pathogens","authors":"R. Blundell, A. Eskalen","doi":"10.3733/ca.2021a0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) are currently considered some of the most important challenges for viticulture, curtailing vineyard longevity and productivity in nearly every raisin, table and wine grape production region in California and worldwide. Pruning wounds provide the main entry point for fungal pathogens responsible for these diseases; pathogens enter the wounds following precipitation events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of selected chemical and experimental biological fungicides for protection of pruning wounds against two of the most common and virulent fungal pathogens causing GTDs: Eutypa lata and Neofusicoccum parvum. This study was conducted on sauvignon blanc at the UC Davis Department of Plant Pathology Field Station. Results showed that several chemical and biological fungicides, notably the chemical fungicide Luna Sensation, the biofungicide Vintec and a combination of the biofungicides Bio-Tam and CrabLife Powder, provided significant protection against at least one of the two canker pathogens used in this study. However, the majority of products tested did not provide simultaneous control of both E. lata and N. parvum pathogens, highlighting the continuing challenge of controlling GTDs.","PeriodicalId":9409,"journal":{"name":"California Agriculture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"California Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.2021a0018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) are currently considered some of the most important challenges for viticulture, curtailing vineyard longevity and productivity in nearly every raisin, table and wine grape production region in California and worldwide. Pruning wounds provide the main entry point for fungal pathogens responsible for these diseases; pathogens enter the wounds following precipitation events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of selected chemical and experimental biological fungicides for protection of pruning wounds against two of the most common and virulent fungal pathogens causing GTDs: Eutypa lata and Neofusicoccum parvum. This study was conducted on sauvignon blanc at the UC Davis Department of Plant Pathology Field Station. Results showed that several chemical and biological fungicides, notably the chemical fungicide Luna Sensation, the biofungicide Vintec and a combination of the biofungicides Bio-Tam and CrabLife Powder, provided significant protection against at least one of the two canker pathogens used in this study. However, the majority of products tested did not provide simultaneous control of both E. lata and N. parvum pathogens, highlighting the continuing challenge of controlling GTDs.
生物和化学修剪伤口保护剂减少葡萄树干病病原体的感染
葡萄树干病害(gtd)目前被认为是葡萄栽培面临的一些最重要的挑战,在加利福尼亚和全世界几乎每个葡萄干、食用和酿酒葡萄产区,它都缩短了葡萄园的寿命和生产力。修剪伤口为导致这些疾病的真菌病原体提供了主要入口;病原体在降水事件后进入伤口。本研究的目的是评价选定的化学杀菌剂和实验生物杀菌剂对导致GTDs的两种最常见和最毒力的真菌病原体的保护效果,这两种真菌病原体分别是:幼木霉(Eutypa lata)和幼木霉(Neofusicoccum parvum)。这项研究是在加州大学戴维斯分校植物病理学野外站对长相思进行的。结果表明,几种化学和生物杀菌剂,特别是化学杀菌剂Luna Sensation,生物杀菌剂Vintec以及生物杀菌剂Bio-Tam和CrabLife Powder的组合,对本研究中使用的两种溃疡病原体中的至少一种具有显著的保护作用。然而,大多数测试产品不能同时控制拉塔伊夫和小奈尔姆病原体,这突出了控制gtd的持续挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
California Agriculture
California Agriculture 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
17
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信