Early childhood teachers' mathematics-specific professional competence and its relation to the quality of learning support

A. Lindmeier, Selma Seemann, A. Wullschleger, Anuschka Meyer-Wyder, M. Leuchter, Franziska Vogt, Elisabeth Moser Opitz, Aiso Heinze
{"title":"Early childhood teachers' mathematics-specific professional competence and its relation to the quality of learning support","authors":"A. Lindmeier, Selma Seemann, A. Wullschleger, Anuschka Meyer-Wyder, M. Leuchter, Franziska Vogt, Elisabeth Moser Opitz, Aiso Heinze","doi":"10.20396/ZET.V29I00.8661896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teacher expertise research uses different approaches, among them competence models. The model of mathematics-specific professional competence in this study differentiates action-related and reflective competence, which pertain to different types of professional demands according to dual processing theories and should positively impact teaching quality. The cross-sectional study with early childhood teachers investigates the structure of teacher competence and its relations to the quality of learning support in line with the notion of adaptive teaching when playing board games. The findings support a differentiation of competences according to the model (structural validity evidence). Expected relations between competences and the quality of the learning support are partially supported (predictive validity evidence). The study hence adds to research on teacher expertise by developing a specific understanding of competence in line with existing theories. Affordances of using competence models, as well as difficulties and open questions with relation to the emerging approach are discussed.","PeriodicalId":33756,"journal":{"name":"Zetetike","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zetetike","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20396/ZET.V29I00.8661896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Teacher expertise research uses different approaches, among them competence models. The model of mathematics-specific professional competence in this study differentiates action-related and reflective competence, which pertain to different types of professional demands according to dual processing theories and should positively impact teaching quality. The cross-sectional study with early childhood teachers investigates the structure of teacher competence and its relations to the quality of learning support in line with the notion of adaptive teaching when playing board games. The findings support a differentiation of competences according to the model (structural validity evidence). Expected relations between competences and the quality of the learning support are partially supported (predictive validity evidence). The study hence adds to research on teacher expertise by developing a specific understanding of competence in line with existing theories. Affordances of using competence models, as well as difficulties and open questions with relation to the emerging approach are discussed.
幼儿教师数学专业能力及其与学习支持质量的关系
教师专业知识的研究方法多种多样,其中包括胜任力模型。本研究的数学专业能力模型区分了行动相关能力和反思性能力,根据双加工理论,行动相关能力和反思性能力对应于不同类型的专业需求,并应对教学质量产生积极影响。本研究以幼儿教师为研究对象,在适应性教学的基础上,探讨幼儿教师在棋盘游戏中的胜任力结构及其与学习支持质量的关系。研究结果支持根据模型区分能力(结构效度证据)。能力与学习支持质量之间的预期关系得到部分支持(预测效度证据)。因此,本研究在现有理论的基础上发展了对能力的具体理解,从而增加了对教师专业知识的研究。讨论了运用胜任力模型的优点,以及与新方法相关的困难和悬而未决的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信