South African Value-Added Tax: Place of supply rules for cross border supplies of consulting services

IF 1.1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Riette Zulch Lombard, L. van Heerden
{"title":"South African Value-Added Tax: Place of supply rules for cross border supplies of consulting services","authors":"Riette Zulch Lombard, L. van Heerden","doi":"10.1080/10291954.2018.1558808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The South African Value-Added Tax Act, 89 of 1991 does not contain any explicit place of supply rules to determine the jurisdiction where a cross border supply of services should be taxed, except in respect of foreign electronic service providers. Inferred place of supply rules are however interwoven into various provisions of the VAT Act. The OECD developed a set of recommended rules to determine the place of taxation for cross border supplies of services and intangibles. This serves as a reference point for jurisdictions when implementing their VAT legislation, and are described in Chapter 3 of the OECD’s International VAT/GST Guidelines. The primary objective of this article is to determine whether the inferred place of supply rules in the VAT Act are in harmony with the aforementioned recommended rules in the OECD Guidelines in respect of various scenarios of cross border supplies of consulting services. The conclusion is that the inferred place of supply rules in the VAT Act are not in harmony with the recommended rules in the OECD Guidelines in all scenarios of cross border supplies of consulting services. Recommendations are made how the VAT Act can be amended to bring the aforementioned inferred place of supply rules in harmony with the OECD’s recommended rules. This article however does not consider whether the OECD Guidelines are appropriate for developing countries such as South Africa and accordingly, whether South Africa should adopt the recommended rules as proposed in the OECD Guidelines. The recommended changes should thus only be considered if it is found that the OECD model is, in fact, appropriate for South Africa.","PeriodicalId":43731,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Accounting Research","volume":"33 1","pages":"21 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10291954.2018.1558808","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2018.1558808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The South African Value-Added Tax Act, 89 of 1991 does not contain any explicit place of supply rules to determine the jurisdiction where a cross border supply of services should be taxed, except in respect of foreign electronic service providers. Inferred place of supply rules are however interwoven into various provisions of the VAT Act. The OECD developed a set of recommended rules to determine the place of taxation for cross border supplies of services and intangibles. This serves as a reference point for jurisdictions when implementing their VAT legislation, and are described in Chapter 3 of the OECD’s International VAT/GST Guidelines. The primary objective of this article is to determine whether the inferred place of supply rules in the VAT Act are in harmony with the aforementioned recommended rules in the OECD Guidelines in respect of various scenarios of cross border supplies of consulting services. The conclusion is that the inferred place of supply rules in the VAT Act are not in harmony with the recommended rules in the OECD Guidelines in all scenarios of cross border supplies of consulting services. Recommendations are made how the VAT Act can be amended to bring the aforementioned inferred place of supply rules in harmony with the OECD’s recommended rules. This article however does not consider whether the OECD Guidelines are appropriate for developing countries such as South Africa and accordingly, whether South Africa should adopt the recommended rules as proposed in the OECD Guidelines. The recommended changes should thus only be considered if it is found that the OECD model is, in fact, appropriate for South Africa.
南非增值税:咨询服务跨境供应的供应地规则
1991年第89号《南非增值税法》没有包含任何明确的供应地规则,以确定跨境服务供应应纳税的管辖权,但外国电子服务提供商除外。然而,推断的供应地规则交织在《增值税法》的各种条款中。经合组织制定了一套建议规则,以确定跨境服务和无形资产供应的征税地点。这是司法管辖区在实施增值税立法时的参考点,经合组织《国际增值税/商品及服务税指南》第3章对此进行了描述。本条的主要目的是确定《增值税法》中推断的供应地规则是否与经合组织指南中关于跨境提供咨询服务的各种情况的上述建议规则一致。结论是,在所有跨境提供咨询服务的情况下,《增值税法》中推断的供应地规则与《经合组织指南》中建议的规则不一致。建议如何修订《增值税法》,使上述推断的供应地规则与经合组织建议的规则相一致。然而,本条没有考虑经合组织准则是否适用于南非等发展中国家,因此,南非是否应该采用经合组织准则中提出的建议规则。因此,只有在发现经合组织模式实际上适合南非的情况下,才应考虑建议的修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信