Seeking a disciplinary identity – the case of comparative legal history

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW

Comparative Legal History Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/2049677x.2020.1830491

J. Husa

引用次数: 0

Abstract

To be, or not to be, that is the question 1 During the last couple of decades, the field of comparative legal history has gradually taken shape. Indeed, it is perhaps not an exaggeration to depict ...

查看原文本刊更多论文

寻求学科认同——比较法律史案例

生存还是毁灭，这是一个问题。在过去的几十年里，比较法律史领域逐渐形成。的确，描述……也许并不夸张。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Comparative Legal History LAW-

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Comparative Legal History is an international and comparative review of law and history. Articles will explore both ''internal'' legal history (doctrinal and disciplinary developments in the law) and ''external'' legal history (legal ideas and institutions in wider contexts). Rooted in the complexity of the various Western legal traditions worldwide, the journal will also investigate other laws and customs from around the globe. Comparisons may be either temporal or geographical and both legal and other law-like normative traditions will be considered. Scholarship on comparative and trans-national historiography, including trans-disciplinary approaches, is particularly welcome.