Dead Reckoning: A Multiteam System Approach to Commentaries on the Drake-S Equation for Survival

Q1 Arts and Humanities
James Houran, Adam J. Rock, Brian Laythe, Patrizio E. Tressoldi
{"title":"Dead Reckoning: A Multiteam System Approach to Commentaries on the Drake-S Equation for Survival","authors":"James Houran, Adam J. Rock, Brian Laythe, Patrizio E. Tressoldi","doi":"10.24972/ijts.2023.42.1.80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We used a multiteam system approach (MTS) to map the critical and constructive feedback from four invited Commentaries on Rock et al.’s (2023) probabilistic analysis of purported evidence for postmortem survival. The goal was to mine actionable insights to guide future research with the potential for important learnings or breakthroughs about the nature or limits of human consciousness and their relation to transpersonal psychology. The commentators’ input identified only a few measurable variables or empirical tactics that conceivably challenge or refine our latest Drake-S Equation for survival. However, a review of these suggestions using logical and statistical criteria revealed that none immediately upend our previous conclusion that the published effect sizes for various Known Confounds (including hypothetical \"living agent psi\") do not fully account for the published prevalence rates of Anomalous Experiences traditionally interpretated as survival. However, the commentators proposed several good recommendations for new studies that could eventually alter this calculus. Accordingly, we outline the architecture of a proposed cross-disciplinary research program that extends the present MTS approach and its collected insights and focuses strictly on empiricism over rhetoric in this domain. The results of this coordinated effort should likewise help to clarify a range of psychological and biomedical phenomena that speak to the nature and limits of human consciousness.","PeriodicalId":38668,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transpersonal Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transpersonal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24972/ijts.2023.42.1.80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We used a multiteam system approach (MTS) to map the critical and constructive feedback from four invited Commentaries on Rock et al.’s (2023) probabilistic analysis of purported evidence for postmortem survival. The goal was to mine actionable insights to guide future research with the potential for important learnings or breakthroughs about the nature or limits of human consciousness and their relation to transpersonal psychology. The commentators’ input identified only a few measurable variables or empirical tactics that conceivably challenge or refine our latest Drake-S Equation for survival. However, a review of these suggestions using logical and statistical criteria revealed that none immediately upend our previous conclusion that the published effect sizes for various Known Confounds (including hypothetical "living agent psi") do not fully account for the published prevalence rates of Anomalous Experiences traditionally interpretated as survival. However, the commentators proposed several good recommendations for new studies that could eventually alter this calculus. Accordingly, we outline the architecture of a proposed cross-disciplinary research program that extends the present MTS approach and its collected insights and focuses strictly on empiricism over rhetoric in this domain. The results of this coordinated effort should likewise help to clarify a range of psychological and biomedical phenomena that speak to the nature and limits of human consciousness.
航位推算:多团队系统方法对德雷克- s生存方程的评论
我们使用多团队系统方法(MTS)绘制了四位受邀评论人士对Rock等人(2023)声称的死后存活证据的概率分析的关键和建设性反馈。目标是挖掘可操作的见解,以指导未来的研究,有可能对人类意识的性质或局限性及其与超个人心理学的关系进行重要的学习或突破。评论员的意见只确定了几个可测量的变量或经验策略,这些变量或策略可以挑战或完善我们最新的Drake-S生存方程。然而,使用逻辑和统计标准对这些建议进行的审查表明,没有一项建议立即推翻我们之前的结论,即已公布的各种已知困惑的影响大小(包括假设的“活体psi”)并不能完全解释传统上被解释为生存的异常经历的已公布患病率。然而,评论家们为最终可能改变这一演算的新研究提出了一些很好的建议。因此,我们概述了一个拟议的跨学科研究项目的架构,该项目扩展了目前的MTS方法及其收集的见解,并在该领域严格关注经验主义而非修辞学。这种协调努力的结果同样有助于澄清一系列心理和生物医学现象,这些现象反映了人类意识的性质和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Transpersonal Studies
International Journal of Transpersonal Studies Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信