“We can't save the planet, we're too busy saving lives”: Exploring beliefs about decarbonizing the NHS

F Fylan , G Allison
{"title":"“We can't save the planet, we're too busy saving lives”: Exploring beliefs about decarbonizing the NHS","authors":"F Fylan ,&nbsp;G Allison","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2023.100241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>If health and social care delivery systems are to achieve net zero targets, fundamental changes are required to how organizations deliver care, how individuals practice clinically, how people access care, and how systems reduce the demand for healthcare. This paper explores how professionals, patients and citizens respond to this need for change.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a mixed methods study, comprising 12 deliberative workshops (<em>n</em> = 35) and a survey (<em>n</em> = 413) with health and social care staff, patients and citizens in the North of England.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found that while few people were aware of the net zero target, they supported it. Some, however, questioned organizational commitment, highlighting potential conflicts between cost and sustainability. Staff described a lack of agency to make changes to their practice, despite identifying many opportunities to do so. Some believed that healthcare should be exempt from carbon reduction targets. The strongest messages we found to interest, empower, and motivate people to make changes are: that individual actions matter; that we have a responsibility to set a good example of tackling climate change; and that making changes saves lives and should be a priority. We also found that people need to be reassured that the changes will not adversely affect clinical outcomes. Finally, progress towards targets needs to be tracked and publicly available.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our results indicate a need for clear leadership which gives sustainability a higher priority, a need for staff training to enable conversations about the environmental effects of treatment, and support for shifting the focus from treating illness to promoting health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of climate change and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266727822300041X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

If health and social care delivery systems are to achieve net zero targets, fundamental changes are required to how organizations deliver care, how individuals practice clinically, how people access care, and how systems reduce the demand for healthcare. This paper explores how professionals, patients and citizens respond to this need for change.

Methods

We conducted a mixed methods study, comprising 12 deliberative workshops (n = 35) and a survey (n = 413) with health and social care staff, patients and citizens in the North of England.

Results

We found that while few people were aware of the net zero target, they supported it. Some, however, questioned organizational commitment, highlighting potential conflicts between cost and sustainability. Staff described a lack of agency to make changes to their practice, despite identifying many opportunities to do so. Some believed that healthcare should be exempt from carbon reduction targets. The strongest messages we found to interest, empower, and motivate people to make changes are: that individual actions matter; that we have a responsibility to set a good example of tackling climate change; and that making changes saves lives and should be a priority. We also found that people need to be reassured that the changes will not adversely affect clinical outcomes. Finally, progress towards targets needs to be tracked and publicly available.

Conclusion

Our results indicate a need for clear leadership which gives sustainability a higher priority, a need for staff training to enable conversations about the environmental effects of treatment, and support for shifting the focus from treating illness to promoting health.

“我们不能拯救地球,我们太忙于拯救生命”:探索关于NHS脱碳的信念
如果卫生和社会保健提供系统要实现净零目标,就需要在组织如何提供保健、个人如何临床实践、人们如何获得保健以及系统如何减少对保健的需求等方面进行根本性的变革。本文探讨了专业人士、患者和公民如何应对这种变革需求。方法我们进行了一项混合方法研究,包括12个审议研讨会(n = 35)和一项调查(n = 413),对象是英格兰北部的卫生和社会护理人员、患者和公民。结果我们发现,虽然很少有人意识到净零目标,但他们支持它。然而,一些人质疑组织承诺,强调成本和可持续性之间的潜在冲突。工作人员表示,尽管发现了很多机会,但缺乏对他们的做法进行改变的机构。一些人认为,医疗保健应该被排除在碳减排目标之外。我们发现,最能激发人们兴趣、赋予人们力量并激励他们做出改变的信息是:个人行动很重要;我们有责任在应对气候变化方面树立好榜样;做出改变可以拯救生命,应该是优先考虑的事情。我们还发现,人们需要得到保证,这些变化不会对临床结果产生不利影响。最后,实现目标的进展需要得到跟踪和公开。结论:我们的研究结果表明,需要明确的领导,将可持续性置于更高的优先地位,需要对员工进行培训,使他们能够讨论治疗的环境影响,并支持将重点从治疗疾病转移到促进健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The journal of climate change and health
The journal of climate change and health Global and Planetary Change, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信