After Presenting Multiple Solution Strategies, What’s Next? Examining the Mathematical Connections Made by Preservice Teachers

Indira Gil, Laura Zamudio-Orozco, Barbara King
{"title":"After Presenting Multiple Solution Strategies, What’s Next? Examining the Mathematical Connections Made by Preservice Teachers","authors":"Indira Gil, Laura Zamudio-Orozco, Barbara King","doi":"10.7916/JMETC.V10I2.4191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When teaching through problem solving, effective mathematics teachers need to lead discussions that assist students in making connections between different solution strategies. However, while teaching a methods course for preservice teachers (PSTs), we noticed that after solving a problem and presenting various solution strategies, many PSTs seemed lost on how to proceed with the mathematics lesson. To address this issue, we designed an action research study where we implemented Smith and Stein’s (2011) five practices for orchestrating productive classroom discussions, and focused our attention on the fifth practice, making connections. Specifically, we designed an instructional intervention to examine the type of connections made by PSTs and how these connections changed as the course progressed to aid PSTs’ connection making skills. We identified three types of connections made by PSTs: superficial knowledge connections, procedural knowledge connections, and conceptual knowledge connections. Additionally, we observed a decrease in the amount of superficial knowledge connections and an increase in the amounts of procedural knowledge connections and conceptual knowledge connections made by PSTs throughout the course.","PeriodicalId":30179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College","volume":"10 1","pages":"9-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/JMETC.V10I2.4191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

When teaching through problem solving, effective mathematics teachers need to lead discussions that assist students in making connections between different solution strategies. However, while teaching a methods course for preservice teachers (PSTs), we noticed that after solving a problem and presenting various solution strategies, many PSTs seemed lost on how to proceed with the mathematics lesson. To address this issue, we designed an action research study where we implemented Smith and Stein’s (2011) five practices for orchestrating productive classroom discussions, and focused our attention on the fifth practice, making connections. Specifically, we designed an instructional intervention to examine the type of connections made by PSTs and how these connections changed as the course progressed to aid PSTs’ connection making skills. We identified three types of connections made by PSTs: superficial knowledge connections, procedural knowledge connections, and conceptual knowledge connections. Additionally, we observed a decrease in the amount of superficial knowledge connections and an increase in the amounts of procedural knowledge connections and conceptual knowledge connections made by PSTs throughout the course.
在介绍了多种解决方案策略之后,下一步是什么?探究语文教师的数学联系
当通过解决问题进行教学时,有效的数学教师需要引导讨论,帮助学生在不同的解决策略之间建立联系。然而,在为职前教师(pst)讲授方法课程时,我们注意到,在解决了一个问题并提出了各种解决策略后,许多pst似乎不知道如何继续进行数学课。为了解决这个问题,我们设计了一项行动研究,其中我们实施了Smith和Stein(2011)的五种实践来协调富有成效的课堂讨论,并将我们的注意力集中在第五种实践上,即建立联系。具体来说,我们设计了一个教学干预来检查pst建立的连接类型,以及这些连接如何随着课程的进展而变化,以帮助pst建立连接技能。我们将pst的连接分为三种类型:表面性知识连接、程序性知识连接和概念性知识连接。此外,我们观察到pst在整个课程中形成的表面知识连接的数量减少,程序性知识连接和概念性知识连接的数量增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信